Article

One thing that someone complains about after every trial is that the other side offered prejudicial evidence that the judge should have excluded. It’s almost always a loser argument. But it carried the day in Argueta v. Worldwide Flight Servs. (D2d8 Nov. 8, 2023 No. B306910) [nonpub. opn.]. Dissenting, Justice Grimes still thought it was...Read More >>

Getting sanctioned only $10,000 was a very lenient outcome for the appellant’s abhorrent—and inexplicable—behavior in Schwartzman v. S. Coast Tax Resolution, Inc. (D2d2 Nov. 17, 2023 No. B314770) [nonpub. opn.]. While ending in a tirade against the trial judge, the appellate justices, and the whole judicial system, the case started off pretty boring. Schwartzman filed...Read More >>

In a recent opinion, the Court of Appeal reversed by noting that one of the grounds supporting the judgment was forfeited…by the respondent. Wait. By the respondent? An appellant must be careful not to forfeit argument, but not the respondent. We discuss, and express gratitude that this one was not published—and thus cannot be cited...Read More >>

An appeal becomes moot when something happens so that nothing the Court of Appeal might do about the judgment will help. Like when a challenged law is repealed, or when a disputed real property is sold. When the appeal is moot, the appeal is dismissed. Except every so often, when mootness means the appeal results...Read More >>

Trial resulted in a sizable judgment against your client. You know to stay judgment enforcement you have to post a bond, but what, exactly, does that mean? And how do you do it? Enter Dan Huckabay from Court Surety Bond Agency. We sit down with Dan and ask him how we attorneys can be a...Read More >>

CEB’s DailyNews has published my article, “How to Preserve Appellate Rights in Your Arbitration Agreement.” The article illustrates how to use the California Supreme Court’s suggestion in Cable Connection, Inc. v. DIRECTV, Inc. (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1334 that parties agreeing to arbitration may also agree that the award be subject to judicial review on the merits. The case is...Read More >>

North American made more than 300 home loans without a license, Justice Dato noted in his dissent in Lagrisola v. North American (D4d1 Nov. 3, 2023 No. D080758). Plaintiffs were among the borrowers, and sued to recover all “illegal interest” and finance charges the lender had charged on their loan. The trial court disagreed with...Read More >>

“A bulldozer can move piles of dirt from one place to another,” begins the opinion in Tedesco v. White (D4d3 Oct. 27, 2023 No. G061197) [nonpub. opn.]. “But when the goal is to move minds rather than dirt, employing a bulldozer may be counterproductive. The bulldozer in this case is [appellant’s] counsel.” The aggressive tactics...Read More >>

The employee-appellant in Lewis v. Reptile Factory, LLC (D2d3 Oct. 12, 2023 No. B324197) [nonpub. opn.] challenged the trial court’s refusal to issue a statement of decision. The losing party has a right to a statement of decision, but only if timely requested. What is the deadline? There are two: 10 days, normally, but for...Read More >>

A bedrock rule of appellate practice is that an appellant who fails to brief an issue forfeits that issue. That rule applies to appellants. You know, the person challenging the judgment. It does not apply to the respondent—the person defending the judgment. Why? Because a bedrock principle of appellate review is that all intendments and...Read More >>

Appellate courts are in the affirming business. But be ready to take advantage of easy reversals, like in these examples: 😎 If the court refuses to hold an evidentiary hearing in a contested probate matter, that is (probably) structural error and reversible. 😎 If the court refuses to provide a statement of decision on key...Read More >>

The employer-defendants made good use of the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022). They compelled arbitration of plaintiff-employee’s individual claims, and then got the PAGA claims dismissed. Plaintiff appealed from the dismissal. But then as court watchers anticipated, the California Supreme Court handed down Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc., holding that...Read More >>

One advantage to a bench trial is that you are entitled to a statement of decision. This can be better than a jury verdict because a statement of decision includes findings on all material issues. The cross-defendant in the development dispute in Casa Verde Landscaping Maint. Corp. v. Lennary Cmtys. (D4d1 Oct. 24, 2023 D081550)...Read More >>

Ninth Circuit correspondent Cory Webster joins us to discuss the court’s unusually busy en banc docket and its own species of “shadow docket.” We discuss how parties and judges are moving a few hot-button cases into procedural positions that may suggest what the merits decision will be—but without really touching the merits. We discuss:  ...Read More >>

I will tell you two facts about this recent arbitration case, and let you guess how the Court of Appeal concluded. But be warned: your guess will be wrong. Fact one: The arbitrator found for the buyer (in a dispute over a business sale) based on the arbitrator’s conclusion that the seller’s lack of credibility...Read More >>

Have you ever had trouble e-file something and had someone tell you to try a different web browser? When it comes to the CM/ECF system used by federal courts, that problem has to do with aging technology reliant on “java” plugins, which have security problems. Susan Gelmis, the Chief Deputy Clerk for Operations, explains why...Read More >>

After the County of San Benito dragged its feet in responding to a natural resources group’s Public Records Act request about the controversial Strada Verde Project, the group sued for a writ of mandate to enforce their right to transparency. They did have that right, but the court in San Benito v. Superior Court (D6...Read More >>

If you’re planning to appeal, you need a court reporter at your hearing. But what if the hearing is over a pure question of law, like whether there’s an enforceable arbitration provision? That’s what happened in Olague v. United Care Facilities, LLC (D2d5 Sep. 29. 2023) No. B323075 (nonpub. opn.), involving an appeal from a...Read More >>

A restraining order is available under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 if you have suffered harassment through a “knowing and willful course of conduct” resulting in harassment. And what type of people are more likely to cause a feeling of harassment more than lawyers? So attorney Jacquelynn Hansen got a restraining order against her...Read More >>

After a trust beneficiary petitioned for over $1 million in trust distributions in Barbey v. Pnc Bank, N.A. (D2d6 Oct. 10, 2023) No. B325472 (nonpub. opn.), the trustees contested the petition and requested an evidentiary hearing. The probate court refused to hold an evidentiary hearing. Yes, I know “to some persons a million sounds like...Read More >>

After a former employee won a claim against the employer in Snoeck v. ExakTime Innovations, Inc., (D2d3 Oct. 2, 2023) No. B321566 (nonpub. opn.), the court granted the motion for attorneys’ fees. The court agreed that the value of counsel’s efforts would have been over $1.1 million. Would have been. But then the court applied...Read More >>

At trial, you have a right to impeach an adverse witness’s testimony. The court denied that right in People v. Bingham (D1d5 Sep. 26, 2023) No. A163112 (nonpub. opn.). The court admitted the 911 call of Bingham’s girlfriend reporting that Bingham had beat her up with a lock, but excluded her subsequent statements recanting. That...Read More >>

If you set out to achieve the “impossible,” you are ambitious, but not alone. Impossible Foods, creator of the “Impossible Burger,” learned that another company, Impossible X, was also using the “Impossible” brand on some personal fitness and lifestyle websites, an Amazon platform, and a YouTube channel. But its sole owner-operator, Joel Runyon, lived in...Read More >>

Congress has not enacted an anti-SLAPP statute like the ones in many states, such as California, which prohibit “strategic lawsuits against public participation.” Anti-SLAPP motions protect defendants sued for defamation or the like. But again, there is no federal anti-SLAPP law providing for such a motion. Still, that has proved no problem for the 9th...Read More >>

A lot of savvy litigants search the web for ways to vacate an order after the time to appeal has expired. I know because many of these litigants have found my writings on this subject. Challenges made after the appeal deadline has expired is fruitless, you say? Well, sometimes it can work: section 473 of...Read More >>

So you have been sued and successfully compelled arbitration. Next step: do not fail to ensure your arbitration fees are received within 30 days. Not just paid, but received. The employer-defendant in Doe v. The Superior Court (D1d3 Sep. 8, 2023) No. A167105 put the check in the mail on day 25, but it was...Read More >>

Sometimes in the weeks prior to an appellate oral argument, the court will order the parties to be prepared to discuss certain issues or cases. Sometimes this is called a focus letter or a pre-argument order. They are pretty common in the Ninth Circuit. But a dissent to a pre-argument order is less common. In...Read More >>

The Judicial Council provides a form Notice of Appeal. But be careful if you use this form because it asks for extra information that could be used to limit the scope of your appeal or cause you to appeal from the wrong order. That is what nearly happened in Lacour v. Marshalls of California (D1d4...Read More >>

When a judge enters an order, and then later modifies the order, you would probably guess that you should appeal from the modified order. And you would be right. But now try this: Voiding the modified order reinstates the original order, and the time to appeal from the original order has expired. What now? The...Read More >>

I have yet to meet an attorney who would not welcome the appellate court providing a tentative opinion prior to oral argument. All upside, no downside, right? There was a downside in Navellier v. Putnam (D1d5 Aug. 17, 2023) No. A166476 (reh’g denied with mods Aug. 30, 2023) (nonpub. opn.). The plaintiffs’ case was dismissed...Read More >>