Kowal Law Group Logo

Could a California judge enjoin Donald Trump from seeking a loan to get an appellate bond?

Tim Kowal     February 26, 2024

By now, you know about the $350 million-plus in damages that New York judge Arthur F Engoron awarded against Donald Trump and his companies. Trial-court news normally has a short expiration date, as it awaits the bigger news about what happens on appeal. But an appeal could be off the table because of a striking order at the end of the ruling. The order enjoins the Trump defendants from applying for any loans—and that might prevent them from getting an appeal bond. Here is the order:

“The Court hereby enjoins Donald Trump and the Trump Organization and its affiliates from applying for loans from any financial institution chartered by or registered with the New York Department of Financial Services for a period of three years.”

Like California, New York allows an appellant to stay enforcement of a money judgment upon posting a bond to secure payment of the judgment. (N.Y. CPLR 5519.) A bond is critical because, unless judgment-enforcement is stayed, an appeal is often impracticable. In addition to embarrassment, oppression, and harassment, the appellant’s attorneys have limited options to secure payment from a client whose assets are subject to seizure. For example, appellate attorneys cannot hold their client’s funds in trust because those funds may be subject to enforcement liens. (On multiple occasions, aggressive creditors’ counsel have imposed liens upon my appellate clients’ trust accounts, preventing me from securing payment for my appellate services.)

Bonding an appeal is a win-win: the appellant is able to pursue his appellate rights and pay his attorneys, and the prevailing parties are secured payment of their judgment. (See Venice Canals Resident Home Owners v. Superior Ct. (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 675, 683 ["Requiring the posting of a stay bond serves the purpose of protecting the rights of innocent third parties.”].)

So Judge Engoron’s loan-prohibition is chilling. The trial judge’s ruling will have the effect of making it more difficult for the defendants to put up the collateral needed for an appellate bond. This hurts the defendants, obviously. Will it help creditors? To the contrary, if Trump is unable to post a bond, it may hurt creditors, who will not enjoy the benefit of having their judgment bonded.

What about protecting lenders? Will Judge Engoron protect lenders from extending bad loans? I do not know about New York lenders—perhaps they are not sophisticated enough to manage their transactions without the aid of a trial judge. But even so, Judge Engoron’s ruling is already extremely well-publicized, so any lender to be protected is already sufficiently on notice.

It is not clear what left is to be accomplished by the loan-prohibition—except to discourage an appeal. And discouraging appeals is not a legitimate use of judicial power. Perhaps the rule is different in New York, but in California a trial court cannot prohibit an appeal from its own judgment. (MacDonald v. Superior Court (1977) 75 Cal.App.3d 692, 696-697; see also In re Marriage of Reese & Guy (1999) 73 Cal.App.4th 1214, 1222, fn. 4 [finding it "highly inappropriate for a trial court to attempt to dissuade a litigant from exercising his or her right to appeal"].)

So under California law, an appellant would have a good argument that the order prohibiting the appellant from seeking a loan for purposes of securing an appellate bond likely would be unenforceable. But perhaps New York law is different.

Tim Kowal is an appellate specialist certified by the California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization. Tim helps trial attorneys and clients win their cases and avoid error on appeal. He co-hosts the Cal. Appellate Law Podcast at CALpodcast.com, and publishes summaries of cases and appellate tips for trial attorneys. Contact Tim at [email protected] or (949) 676-9989.
Get “Not To Be Published,” a weekly digest of these articles, delivered directly to your inbox!

Show neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your fellow men justly.


"So far as the beginnings of law had theories, the first theory of liability was in terms of a duty to buy off the vengeance of him to whom an injury had been done whether by oneself or by something in one's power. The idea is put strikingly in the Anglo-Saxon legal proverb, 'Buy spear from side or bear it,' that is, buy off the feud or fight it out."

— Roscoe Pound, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law

"God made the angels to show Him splendor, … Man He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of his mind."

— Sir Thomas More in Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons

“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?”

— James Madison, Federalist 62

"Moot points have to be settled somehow, once they get thrust upon us. If an assertion cannot be proved, then it must be settled some other way, and nearly all of these ways are unfair to somebody."

—T.H. White, The Once and Future King

"Counsel on the firing line in an actual trial must be prepared for surprises, including requests for amendments of pleading. They cannot ask that a judgment afterwards obtained be set aside merely because their equilibrium was slightly disturbed by an unexpected motion."

Posz v. Burchell (1962) 209 Cal.App.2d 324, 334

"At common law, barratry was 'the offense of frequently exciting and stirring up suits and quarrels' (4 Blackstone, Commentaries 134) and was punished as a misdemeanor."

Rubin v. Green (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1187

"Upon putting laws into writing, they became even harder to change than before, and a hundred legal fictions rose to reconcile them with reality."

— Will Durant

"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."

— Plato (427-347 B.C.)

"A judge is a law student who grades his own papers."

— H.L. Mencken

"It may be that the court is thought to be excessively legalistic. I should be sorry to think that it is anything else."

— Hon. Sir Owen Dixon, Chief Justice of Australia

Copyright © 2024 Kowal Law Group
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram