Kowal Law Group Logo

Appellate Attorney Specializing in 
California State and Federal Appeals

Studies have shown that nearly two-thirds of litigants in civil cases are dissatisfied with the outcome of their trial. Unsuccessful outcomes can come at any stage of the case, including on a demurrer or motion to dismiss, on a motion for summary judgment, after trial, or after post-trial motions. 

Fortunately, in many cases, an appellate attorney can help prevent or change unsuccessful outcomes. Our appellate specialists help their clients develop appellate strategies to maximize the chances of getting a just outcome.

Timothy Kowal and the Appellate Specialists at
the Kowal Law Group work with:

~Trial Attorneys ~Trustees/Fiduciaries
~Corporations ~Business Owners ~Developers
~Lenders & Borrowers ~Individuals

If your case involves high-stakes, multi-party, or protracted civil litigation, it is critical to talk to an Appellate Specialist immediately.

What is an Appellate Attorney?

An appellate attorney is an attorney that will handle the case if the client pursues an appeal. In the usual case, the client works with a trial lawyer while in the trial court, who takes the case before the judge and jury in the Superior Court of Los Angeles or Orange County or other counties, or in the United States federal district court. If the trial results in an unfavorable verdict and judgment, an appellate attorney will help the client’s case to the next level—either the California Court of Appeal or the United States Circuit Court of Appeals. 

Appellate attorneys identify potential errors in the original trial proceedings, such as unfair trial practices or legal issues with the case, and use these discrepancies to change the outcome of the verdict.

Contrary to popular belief, you should not wait until you win or lose your case to seek the counsel of an appellate attorney. In fact, you can consult with an appellate attorney early in the litigation process so you can better understand the next steps should you need to appeal your judgment once you get further along in the process.

Can't the Trial Attorney Handle the Appeal?

Nobody knows a case like the trial attorney. But the catch is: Nobody ever will... including the Court of Appeal. You need someone who can see the case the way the appellate judges will see the case. And that is not the trial attorney. That is an appellate attorney.

Watch a short video answering this question here:

A Different Approach to Appeals

Many Appellate Specialists handle appeals exclusively, and rarely set foot inside a trial court. Our approach is different. An appeal is usually won or lost before it gets to the appellate court: raising arguments to be used on appeal; adding missing evidence to the record; and giving the trial court the chance to fix its errors are all necessary to succeed on appeal.

This is the most effective, challenging, and interesting part of any appeal. We know of no other firm with the same unique approach and skill set.

Appellate FAQ

In most cases, determining if your case will qualify for an appeal will depend on two main factors:

  1. If the court that initially decided the case made a legal mistake
  2. If the mistake made by the court affected the judgment in a way that was harmful, or prejudicial, to the client

When you work with an appellate attorney, the attorney will determine if these two conditions have been met and if so, appeal your case to a higher court. A qualified appellate attorney carefully reviews the factual and procedural record to determine the existence and extent of any errors. When appellate counsel is involved in the trial, appellate counsel can help identify and correct errors before they result in prejudice to the client. An appellate attorney will also advise whether the errors should be raised in a motion for a new trial, or in a motion to vacate the judgment. In the case of a bench trial, an appellate attorney will help ensure the critical statement of decision is timely requested before a judgment is entered, and make all necessary objections to a defective or insufficient tentative decision or proposed statement of decision. 

What orders to appeal, and when to appeal, can be extremely difficult questions to answer correctly. While California Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1 lists the types of orders that are appealable, it is not an exhaustive list. Making matters more difficult, trial courts often enter orders that are not appealable at first glance, and are only appealable by analyzing the contents and effect of the order. 

Once you have determined the court has entered an appealable order, it is possible for the losing party in the civil or criminal lawsuit to appeal the decision. It is important to note, however, that in a criminal lawsuit generally the prosecution may not appeal a verdict in favor of the defendant—i.e. a “not guilty” verdict cannot be appealed.

While anyone has the right to appeal their court decision themselves, it is not recommended to do so without an experienced appellate attorney on your side. In some cases, a notice of appeal that does not correctly identify the type of order appealed from has been grounds for dismissing the appeal. In other cases, a notice of appeal filed too early has been grounds for dismissing the appeal. The Court of Appeal may decide to review non-appealable orders as an appealable order, or as a writ petition. But the Court of Appeal might also decide not to do so. In such a case, an appellate attorney will file both an appeal and a writ petition. 

An appellate lawyer will counsel the client on the available grounds for an appeal or writ petition, and can help ensure compliance with all of the complicated and strict deadlines associated with the appeal. 

Just because you lose your court case does not mean you should lose hope. If you are unhappy with the final judgment, you can enlist the help of an appellate attorney to help you file for an appeal. They will consult with you to determine if you have a case, file the notice of appeal to the court, submit a written brief, and present an oral argument on your behalf. While you may be able to manage some of these elements yourself, the appellate lawyer is a priceless resource to counsel you on exactly what your options are and what your winning strategy should be to get the outcome you are seeking from the court.

1 - The Initial Consultation

In the initial consultation with your appellate lawyer, you will explain why you believe the judgment on your case was incorrect and what occurred during your trial. Think of this as a two-way meeting with your potential appellate attorney—not only is the appellate attorney evaluating if your case is one they would like to take on, but you are also evaluating if they are the best lawyer available to serve your needs. Make sure the appellate attorney is listening and asking questions to ensure your case is getting the attention it deserves, and that the attorney will be a valuable resource for you during the appeals process. Appellate attorneys must be extremely motivated and highly detail-oriented, so making sure you choose the right one will help the remainder of the process go much more smoothly. If you decide to continue working with an attorney after the initial consultation, things will process to step two.

2 - Preparing to Appeal the Case

After you hire your appellate lawyer and decide to file an appeal in your case, the record preparation process begins. First, the appellate attorney will need to file and serve the notice of appeal and order the record on appeal, so the court and the other party are made aware that you are appealing the case. This will ensure you do not miss the appellate deadline, which is very strict in California as courts consider it to be a jurisdictional deadline. 

Analyzing the appealability of the order, and the notice of appeal, are crucial to your appeal. Close to 5% of appeals are dismissed for technical reasons like nonappealability or untimeliness. 

The designation of record may be filed with the notice of appeal, or within 10 days of filing the notice of appeal. The designation of record is also crucial to the appeal’s success.  Any argument the appellate attorney makes in the briefs and at oral argument must be supported in the record. If the necessary support is not identified in the Designation of Record filed at the outset of the case, the arguments may be deemed waived, forfeited, or simply unsupported. Failing to pay close attention to the designation of record can render an appeal moribund.

3 - Presenting the Argument to the Court of Appeal

Presenting the case for an appeal of the judgment or order is where the bulk of the work will take place on your case. Your lawyer must thoroughly research your case and all the surrounding legal implications to look for holes and flaws in the judgment. Then they must work to present a swaying argument to have the appeal be granted. There are two main elements to the appellate litigation part of the process:

The Opening Brief
The opening brief is a critical piece of the appeals process, as it explains to your trial attorney, prosecutor, the jury, and the judge what legal errors were committed and why these resulted in an incorrect judgment in the case. It is also where the specific details of your appeal are outlined, so the court will know if you are asking for a damages award to be reduced, or for a conviction to be overturned, or to be granted a new trial, or to receive a reduced sentence. Presenting the opening brief effectively is key to starting your appeals process off in the best way possible.

The Oral Argument
In the oral argument, your appellate attorney will appeal directly to the judges in the California Court of Appeal or the Ninth Circuit to explain why the appeal should result in a reversal of the judgment. This is not simply a summary of the written briefs. Oral arguments on appeal must anticipate the appellate justices’ questions and concerns. Preparation for oral argument may consume days or even weeks of attorney time in an effort to bring the case to life in a way that written briefs simply cannot. Your appeals lawyer should attempt to build a rapport with the court and answer any questions to make it clear why the appeal should ultimately be granted.

4 - Receiving the Appeals Court’s Decision

Once the briefs and the oral argument have been submitted, the court will provide a written decision within 90 days either reversing the judgment or affirming it. If the appeal is successful, you may receive a reduction in the judgment or a different judgment, or a reduced sentence, or an overturning of your conviction, in which case, your appellate lawyer’s work is largely done. If the Court of Appeal reverses the judgment and remands for a retrial, you will need to consult trial counsel. 

It may be wise to keep your appellate counsel on board to help handle post-appellate matters. These include seeking costs and fees on appeal, recovering moneys collected during efforts to enforce the judgment during appeal, exonerating appellate bonds, and briefing the trial court on the Court of Appeal’s instructions to the trial court and the aspects of the decision that are binding as law of the case.

If your appeal is unsuccessful and the judgment is affirmed, other relief may still be available. In the California state Court of Appeal, in some circumstances you may file a petition for rehearing. You may also file a petition for review to the California Supreme Court, asking the high court to review and, hopefully, reverse the Court of Appeal’s decision. 

Because of the strict deadlines and restrictions placed upon the appeals process, it is advised to seek legal assistance right away if you would like to appeal your judgment or order. In California, you are able to file a notice of appeal as soon as the judgment is signed by the judge and stamped as “filed” by the court clerk, also known as the entry of judgement. In some cases, an order may be filed before the entry of a judgment; be sure to consult an appellate specialist in such cases. 

While you can and should file for the appeal as quickly as possible, there are several deadlines to understand:

For Civil Cases That Involve $25,000 or Less in Judgments

Once you receive a notification that the judgment is being entered, you are required to file your appeal notice on or before whichever is earlier:

  •  30 days after either any party serves a notice of entry of the judgment or order, or the clerk serves a file-stamped copy of the judgment or order, or
  •  90 days after the judgment has been entered. 

For Civil Cases That Involve Over $25,000 in Judgments

Once you receive a notification that the judgment is being entered, you are required to file your appeal notice on or before whichever is earlier:

  • 60 days after either any party serves a notice of entry of the judgment or order, or the clerk serves a file-stamped copy of the judgment or order, or
  • 180 days after the entry of the judgment. 

It is important to note that, except in the case of extensions upon filing certain post-trial motions (motions for new trial, JNOV, or reconsideration), no extensions of the deadlines to file a notice of appeal are available. If your appeal is late, it will be automatically dismissed. Work with an appellate specialist helps ensure your appeal is filed on time. 

In general, your appeal will result in either affirmance or reversal by the appellate court after your attorney presents the oral argument. If your appeal results in reversal, the Court of Appeal will vacate the judgment and send it back for retrial. In some cases, the Court of Appeal may order that the judgment award be reduced, a reduced sentence, overturning of a conviction, or order a different remedy. 

If your appeal is unsuccessful and results in affirmance of the judgment, that does not mean that there is no hope. You can work with your appellate attorney to continue to fight for your desired outcome. You can do this by either having them file a Petition for Rehearing to present a revised appeal argument to the original court, if you can convince a majority of the three-justice panel that there is a substantial error in the decision. An appellate attorney may also file a Petition for Review, which asks the California Supreme Court to consider reviewing your case.

Some clients opt to let their trial attorney handle their appeal. After all, the trial attorney knows the case, and was there at every moment of the trial. So having trial counsel handle the appeal certainly presents some benefits. 

But there are several reasons why every client should consider hiring appellate counsel, either to consult with trial counsel, or to handle the appeal. 

  1. A Fresh Look. It is well-established that all people miss a lot of what happens around them. (A famous video experiment demonstrating this may be found here.) This is true of attorneys as well. A case will look different through the eyes of an attorney in the trial courtroom than through the eyes of an appellate justice reviewing the transcripts. An appellate attorney usually will be better able to tell a client how an appellate court is likely to view the case. 
  2. A Different Rules Set. Appellate courts have their own rules of procedure. Trial counsel who handle appeals only occasionally are unlikely to be aware of all the applicable appellate rules, and the failure to follow some of these rules may delay or doom an appeal. An appellate specialist will be able to avoid procedural missteps -- and will be able to spot the procedural missteps of an opponent. 
  3. A Different Skill Set. Trial courtrooms are busy. Trial judges spend their days instructing juries, ruling on objections to witness examinations, and processing hundreds of cases on their way to trial in just minutes each, sometimes even less. Adapting to this environment, trial attorneys develop a skill set that helps them cut through the noise with punchy, memorable arguments, and crisp recitations of the facts helpful to their case. But a different culture exists in appellate courts. There are no busy jury rooms in appellate courts. There are no witnesses being sworn in and cross-examined. There are no cases to be processed and calendared for trial. Appellate justices spend their entire days just reading briefs, and discussing them with research attorneys and colleagues. In that environment, the kinds of arguments that trial court practice instills in attorneys are received poorly. An argument that fails to consider exceptions, or fails to identify the existence of negative treatment in other cases, may cause appellate justices to find counsel untrustworthy. 
  4. Another Chance at Resolution. After the flurry of activity involved in trial and post-trial motions, both parties’ resources are likely to be strained. A successful plaintiff will be eager to enforce the judgment, while an unsuccessful defendant may be desperate for a respite to re-evaluate options. An appellate attorney can help provide that respite. While an appeal does not automatically stay judgment enforcement in most cases, and appellate attorney can advise on options to obtain a stay. Upon perfecting an appeal and obtaining a stay of enforcement, the appealing defendant will have a new lease on the case, and will be better positioned to discuss potential settlement of the judgment. 

It may seem like common sense to retain a trial lawyer to handle your appeal, but in many cases, you will find that the strengths of a trial lawyer are different from the strengths of an appellate lawyer. In general, trial lawyers are required to present details in a concrete, yet compelling way that captivates a jury and court. On appeal, however, the lawyer must focus directly on swaying the opinion of an appellate judge who has had the luxury of spending large amounts of time with the body of law at issue. For this reason, the appellate attorney must spend substantial more time studying the applicable law in presenting an argument in the Court of Appeal than in the trial court. 

Additionally, during appellate litigation, the approach will generally be much different than it was at the trial. An appellate attorney is not simply reviewing the facts of the case in a different manner. Instead, an appellate attorney, like the appellate justices, will only ever see the trial as it exists on the written record that was made from it: the reporter’s transcript, and the written evidence presented at the trial. Because the appellate attorney will be looking at the trial the same way the Court of Appeal will be, the appellate attorney is in a better position to advise the client on the merits of the appeal. 

Once your appellate lawyer files your notice of appeal of the court’s final decision, it is assigned a docket number by the Court of Appeals Clerk’s Office. Your attorney will then handle any forms and paperwork necessary to continue with the appeal, and the Clerk will make you aware of any problems, such as fees due. While the briefing schedule is set by rule, the Clerk may issue a briefing schedule, which will let you and your attorney know when they will make their written and oral arguments to the Court. Once the Court has a chance to review the appeal, it will either affirm or reverse the judgment.

The Court of Appeal has within its jurisdiction to rule on petitions for writs of mandate (or mandamus) or prohibition (the distinction between a writ of mandate and a writ of prohibition is becoming less commonly recognized.) While the right to appeal is defined by statute and applies only to a narrow set of orders and judgments, the Court of Appeal may review any act of the trial court pursuant to a writ of mandate. 

As a rule, the person seeking the writ needs to move quickly. As most orders could await appellate review in the normal course by waiting for a final judgment, by filing a writ petition the party is essentially telling the Court of Appeal the matter is urgent. So if you do not treat the matter with utmost urgency, it is unlikely the Court of Appeal will be inclined to treat it with urgency, either.

Writ petitions are very rarely granted. Before the Court of Appeal will consider a matter on writ review, the petitioner must establish that the trial court’s order will cause immediate and irreparable harm. 

An amicus brief is a document that is filed in appellate court by a non-litigant with an interest in the subject, and contains additional information or arguments that the courts may want to consider to have an additional perspective on the applicable law. The Supreme Court states that the amicus brief should contain relevant matters not dealt with by the currently litigating parties which may be of assistance in the case. 

If a court has original jurisdiction, that means they are given the right to hear the case initially. If a court has appellate jurisdiction, that means the court may only hear the case by way of reviewing the decision of a lower court. 

For example, most cases begin in trial court. The Court of Appeal has appellate jurisdiction of the judgments of the trial court. The state Constitution gives the Supreme Court the authority to review decisions of the state Courts of Appeal. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 12.) For some kinds of cases, however, the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court may have original jurisdiction. For example, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in proceedings for extraordinary relief in the nature of mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition, and in habeas corpus proceedings. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 10.)

Like the California Supreme Court, the Courts of Appeal have original jurisdiction in habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition proceedings. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 10.)

Moreover, in death penalty cases, the Constitution directs review by the high court. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 11.) This means these cases are automatically appealed directly from the trial court to the Supreme Court, skipping the Court of Appeal. (Pen. Code, § 1239(b).)

  1. Only 2 in 10 appeals are successful; Our success rate is better than 5 in 10.
  2. 1 in 20 appeals is dismissed for technical reasons – due to non-specialists’ lack of familiarity with appellate procedure.
  3. Reduced odds of attorney error: according to the ABA, failing to file documents – such as a notice of appeal – accounts for nearly 10% of legal malpractice.

"Upon putting laws into writing, they became even harder to change than before, and a hundred legal fictions rose to reconcile them with reality."

— Will Durant

"A judge is a law student who grades his own papers."

— H.L. Mencken

"So far as the beginnings of law had theories, the first theory of liability was in terms of a duty to buy off the vengeance of him to whom an injury had been done whether by oneself or by something in one's power. The idea is put strikingly in the Anglo-Saxon legal proverb, 'Buy spear from side or bear it,' that is, buy off the feud or fight it out."

— Roscoe Pound, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law

"It may be that the court is thought to be excessively legalistic. I should be sorry to think that it is anything else."

— Hon. Sir Owen Dixon, Chief Justice of Australia

"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."

— Plato (427-347 B.C.)

Show neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your fellow men justly.


"Counsel on the firing line in an actual trial must be prepared for surprises, including requests for amendments of pleading. They cannot ask that a judgment afterwards obtained be set aside merely because their equilibrium was slightly disturbed by an unexpected motion."

Posz v. Burchell (1962) 209 Cal.App.2d 324, 334

“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?”

— James Madison, Federalist 62

"God made the angels to show Him splendor, … Man He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of his mind."

— Sir Thomas More in Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons

"At common law, barratry was 'the offense of frequently exciting and stirring up suits and quarrels' (4 Blackstone, Commentaries 134) and was punished as a misdemeanor."

Rubin v. Green (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1187

"Moot points have to be settled somehow, once they get thrust upon us. If an assertion cannot be proved, then it must be settled some other way, and nearly all of these ways are unfair to somebody."

—T.H. White, The Once and Future King

Copyright © 2024 Kowal Law Group
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram