Kowal Law Group Logo

Article

Cal Appellate News for Lawyers (Sept. 18, 2020)

Last updated on September 19, 2020 by Tim Kowal
TVA appellate attorney Tim Kowal publishes this weekly update of legal news for trial attorneys. You may subscribe by clicking here. Covid EXTENSIONS Have Expired, But Covid EXCUSES May Still Work The First Appellate District (Rowan v. Kirkpatrick, A160568) observes that while the Covid-related extended deadlines have passed, "Courts have long recognized the policy, based...Read More >>

Cal Appellate News for Lawyers (Sept. 10, 2020)

Last updated on September 10, 2020 by Tim Kowal
TVA appellate attorney Tim Kowal publishes this weekly update of legal news for trial attorneys. You may subscribe by clicking here. Beware Appealing Questions of Law on a Preliminary Injunction: Does New Jersey's ban on large capacity magazines violate the Second Amendment?Third Circuit: We already decided that it does not when we denied the plaintiffs'...Read More >>

Cal Appellate News for Lawyers (Aug. 31, 2020)

Last updated on August 31, 2020 by Tim Kowal
TVA appellate attorney Tim Kowal publishes this weekly update of legal news for trial attorneys. You may subscribe by clicking here. NOT the Schoolhouse Rock Version of Cal. Supreme Court Review.First, a chilling Third District decision says if a sheriff's deputy asks you to check on a neighbor, omits the fact the neighbor had whispered...Read More >>

POKEMON MAKER SEEKS DISMISSAL OF NUISANCE & DISGORGEMENT SUIT

Last updated on April 24, 2020 by Tim Kowal
Pokemon Go-maker Niantec moved to dismiss the class action that alleges the wildly popular app causes droves of users to trespass on private property in order to find, buy, and play with in-game prizes. Niantec points the finger at its users, insisting the game maker is not responsible for what users do since it displays disclaimers telling...Read More >>

PATIO FURNITURE DOES NOT ESTABLISH AN EQUITABLE EASEMENT

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
In a recent property-dispute opinion, the Second District in Shoen v. Zacarias came to the perfectly sensible decision that equity is not aroused by a trespasser's inconvenience in relocating $275 in lawn furniture. As is so often interesting (and frustrating) about the law is that reasonable minds can disagree. In fact, the trial court had ruled otherwise,...Read More >>

OF GOOD FENCES, BAD NEIGHBORS, AND RECOVERING LEGAL COSTS

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
"It is often said that good fences make good neighbors. One might wonder whether there actually is such a correlation between good fences and good neighbors and, if so, whether causality runs in the opposite direction (i.e., maybe good neighbors build good fences). But it cannot be denied that a good fence accurately demarcating the...Read More >>

LITIGATION-FUNDING INDUSTRY CONTINUES TO GROW

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
With the recent publicity of Hulk Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker Media, and specifically the funding of the lawsuit by third-party Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, much attention has been drawn to the practice of "litigation funding." The term refers to the practice in which an outside party funds all or part of a plaintiff's litigation...Read More >>

IRREVOCABLE TRUSTS: NOT FOOLPROOF ASSET PROTECTION DEVICES

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
Irrevocable trusts are often used to protect assets from the reach of creditors, but courts have chipped away at their foundation. In U.S. v. Harris, No. 16-10152 (9th Cir. Apr. 20, 2017), the Ninth Circuit recently held that a beneficiary's right to receive discretionary distributions from an irrevocable trust constitutes "property" to which a government lien...Read More >>

IF A CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSE MATTERS, SO DOES THE FORUM

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
A recent opinion of the California Court of Appeal held a New York choice-of-law clause was ineffective to enforce a party's waiver of jury trial. In Rincon EV Realty LLC v. CP III Rincon Towers, Inc., New York-based parties negotiated a loan agreement with a New York choice-of-law clause, signed the agreement in New York, and...Read More >>

FINDING JUSTICE IN THE GRINDING GEARS OF LITIGATION

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
The right judgment is not always the just result - a judgment often fails to account for the time and expense invested to obtain it. But sometimes, the grinding gears of litigation can be used to achieve some justice. In Leeman v. Adams Extract & Spice Co. (Cal. Ct. App. - May 21, 2015), plaintiff settled a Prop. 65 (toxic chemicals...Read More >>

EMPLOYERS CAN PROTECT THEIR WORKFORCE WITHOUT ENGAGING IN UNLAWFUL RESTRAINT OF TRADE

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
Retaining key personnel is vital to the success of any enterprise. However, the law's prohibition of trade restraints often makes it difficult for employers to protect their workforce and trade secrets. California law broadly states that "every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind...Read More >>

EMPLOYER UNDERPAYS DEPARTING EMPLOYEE $300, GETS STUCK WITH $30,000 FOR EMPLOYEE’S LEGAL FEES

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
Is an employee leaving? Pay up. Pay in full. There is no 'A' for effort. Pay it all. In last month's Court of Appeal opinion in Beck v. Stratton, employee leaves and employer asks his reputable payroll company, ADP, to cash him out. For reasons that "no one at trial court explain," ADP issued a check...Read More >>

DOES THE JUDICIARY UNDERSTAND JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS?

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
The judicial admission is a simple concept: when you take a position in a pleading, discovery response, or open court, you're stuck with it. But whenever you see such a plain and sensible rule, expect to find enough exceptions to fill a volume. For a while, things seemed to go all right. As recently as...Read More >>

COLLECTING AGAINST SPENDTHRIFTS IN BANKRUPTCY, JUDGMENT COLLECTION

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
In our February newsletter, we noted the California Supreme Court was reviewing whether the ambiguous spendthrift protections of Probate Code sections 15300-15309 meant to impose an absolute cap of 25% against creditors. The Court has answered: "no." In its recent decision, styled Carmack v. Reynolds, the Court "hold[s] that the Probate Code does not impose such...Read More >>

CHECKMATING A CHECKERS OPPONENT WITH CCP § 998 OFFERS

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
If you've been involved in litigation, you likely are aware of the "CCP 998 offer." CCP § 998 is a statutory carrot-and-stick to entice parties to make reasonable offers, and to threaten penalties for rejecting reasonable offers. A 998 offer may be made any time up to 10 days before trial or arbitration. The objective...Read More >>

CAN A TRIAL COURT REDUCE ATTORNEYS’ FEES IN A SETTLEMENT?

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
Leeman v. Adams Extract & Spice Co. (Cal. Ct. App. May 21, 2015) says no. As they routinely do, a Prop-65 toxic-chemicals-warning case settles for a trifling amount of penalties but a heaping portion of attorneys' fees - over $72,000, based on rates up to $895 per hour. Doesn't sit right with the trial judge, who...Read More >>

CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT: PUBLIC RECORDS ACT COVERS PUBLIC OFFICIALS’ & EMPLOYEES’ PRIVATE DEVICES

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
In the high-profile case City of San Jose v. Superior Court, the California high court recently held: "when a city employee uses a personal account to communicate about the conduct of public business, the writings may be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act." The Court explains: "The whole purpose of CPRA is to...Read More >>

BROKERS: GET YOUR COMMISSION AGREEMENTS IN WRITING!

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
Last month's decision in Westside Estate Agency, Inc. v. Randall (Cal. Ct. App. - Dec. 1, 2016) began its opinion saying: "We are all familiar with the phrase, "caveat emptor": Buyer beware. This case deals with its less renowned cousin, "caveat sectorem": Broker beware." Section 1624 of the Civil Code says that a real estate broker can...Read More >>

BLACK-AND-WHITE STATUTE OF LIMITATION FOR ATTORNEY-MALPRACTICE ACTIONS GETS A FRESH COAT OF GRAY

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
The one-year period to bring an action for malpractice typically begins after the lawyer last represented you, often easily identified as the date of formal withdrawal. But can it really be that easy? A recent California Court of Appeal decided it's not, holding instead the relationship ended when the attorney served the client with a...Read More >>

BANK ORDERED TO PAY HOMEOWNERS’ ATTORNEY FEES FOR IMPROPER “DUAL-TRACKING”

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
Distressed homeowners subject to lender "dual-tracking" do not need to wait until the end of a lawsuit to recover attorneys' fees if they are successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction, ruled the Third District Court of Appeal today in Monterossa v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. - June 12, 2014). Under a 2012 law, banks are prohibited...Read More >>

ATTENTION ESTATE PLANNERS: QPRTS MAY BE DEEMED REVOCABLE!

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
In a recent decision TVA obtained for the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court held that a QPRT - generally irrevocable and commonly used in estate planning to hold personal residences - may nonetheless be revoked when the debtor retains an right to reacquire ownership of the residence. A former savings-and-loan banker, Robert...Read More >>

A DEFAULT JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED AGAINST YOU WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE. WHAT CAN YOU DO?

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
In today's litigious society, parties are quick to sue others but, due to the demands of life, defendants will oftentimes overlook the lawsuit. Doing so typically results in the entry of a judgment by default - meaning the defendant did not appear in the lawsuit to defend against the complaint. The plaintiff - now the...Read More >>

WHEN BRIEFING APPELLATE ISSUES, LESS IS MORE

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
An attorney pursuing an appeal may be tempted to raise any and all arguments - however flimsy - before the appellate court, in an attempt to see what sticks. The Third Appellate District, however, urges attorneys to resist that temptation. In Leino v. Balkcom, Appellate Case No. C080950, a client and his attorney raised seventeen (!)...Read More >>

ASSET-PROTECTION UPDATE: QPRTS MAY BE DEEMED REVOCABLE!

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
In a recently affirmed decision TVA obtained for the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court held that a QPRT - generally irrevocable and commonly used in estate planning to hold personal residences - may nonetheless be revoked when the debtor retains a right to reacquire ownership of the residence. The View from Inside:QPRTs...Read More >>

YOU MAY BE ABLE TO LIMIT “CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES" IN YOUR CONTRACTS

Last updated on April 17, 2020 by Tim Kowal
Despite best efforts to reduce expectations to a written contract, one can rarely estimate with much accuracy the creative ways a complaining party will claim he has been damaged by an alleged breach. The textbook case from the 19th century in Hadley v. Baxendale arose when a smith delivered a crankshaft too late, and the miller sued...Read More >>

SLAPP NEWS: CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT REITERATES, AGAIN, THAT WRONGDOING IS NOT “SPEECH” JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE TALKED ABOUT IT

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
The high court recently published Park v. Trustees of the Cal. State Univ., reversing a split appellate-panel decision. The Court held plaintiff's retaliation claim could go forward and did not implicate protected conduct just because the trustees' decision involved protected communications. Skimming the decision, I was eager to find a discussion of the Court of Appeal's...Read More >>

A DEFENSE LAWYER'S COMPLAINT: SOME JUDGES DON'T GET IT ABOUT JUDICIAL ADMISSIONS

Last updated on November 28, 2018 by Tim Kowal
Aman is handing out leaflets in the train station, an old Soviet joke has it, when he is stopped by an officer. Examining the leaflets, the officer discovers they are just blank pieces of paper. "What is the meaning of this?" the officer asks. "What is there to write?" the man replies. "It's so obvious!"...Read More >>

DIRTY WORK: DISGORGING THE PROFITS OF TRESPASSING PIPELINES

Last updated on October 15, 2017 by Tim Kowal
There are two kinds of developers: the pessimist, who sees a glass as half-empty, and the optimist, who sees the glass as four-fifths empty. Of California’s 163,000 square miles, just about 31,000 are developed. There’s a lot of opportunity to be had in California dirt. Literally, when it comes to a particular sort: just under...Read More >>

New Discovery Cutoff Extensions, and Other Civil Procedure Updates

Last updated on January 1, 1970 by Tim Kowal
Governor Newsom recently signed SB 1146, which among other provides new Code Civ. Proc., § 599, which extends "any deadlines that have not already passed as of March 19, 2020" upon continuance or postponement of trial. That includes discovery, expert discovery, and summary judgment motions. It also provides at Code Civ. Proc., § 2035.310 that...Read More >>

Measure Twice, Redact Once

Last updated on by Tim Kowal
If you have ever held a redacted document up to the light to see the redacted text, you know other attorneys are doing the same. In a redacted PDF, you might be able to copy and paste the obscured text. I've also seen redactions made with black boxes that could simply be moved aside. Here's...Read More >>
Copyright © 2025 Kowal Law Group
menuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram