Kowal Law Group Logo

Diverse Perspectives

| article | | podcast | | Videos |
November 13, 2023
CEB DailyNews: How to Preserve Appellate Rights in Your Arbitration Agreement

CEB’s DailyNews has published my article, “How to Preserve Appellate Rights in Your Arbitration Agreement.” The article illustrates how to use the California Supreme Court’s suggestion in Cable Connection, Inc. v. DIRECTV, Inc. (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1334 that parties agreeing to arbitration may also agree that the award be subject to judicial review on the merits. The case is...

Read More
November 8, 2023
Dissent would invalidate loan where lender is unlicensed

North American made more than 300 home loans without a license, Justice Dato noted in his dissent in Lagrisola v. North American (D4d1 Nov. 3, 2023 No. D080758). Plaintiffs were among the borrowers, and sued to recover all “illegal interest” and finance charges the lender had charged on their loan. The trial court disagreed with...

Read More
November 7, 2023
Elegant Legal Writing, with author Ryan McCarl

Ryan McCarl, author of the latest book on legal writing, Elegant Legal Writing, sits down with us to discuss why now, more than ever, attorneys need to elevate beyond ChatGPT and distractions to rise to our role as teachers of the law. Ryan offers these actionable tips: 🖋️ “Defer editing” and “second-guessing” until a later...

Read More
November 6, 2023
“Bulldozer” advocacy moves dirt but not minds

“A bulldozer can move piles of dirt from one place to another,” begins the opinion in Tedesco v. White (D4d3 Oct. 27, 2023 No. G061197) [nonpub. opn.]. “But when the goal is to move minds rather than dirt, employing a bulldozer may be counterproductive. The bulldozer in this case is [appellant’s] counsel.” The aggressive tactics...

Read More
November 2, 2023
Failing to log the length of trial leads to appellate loss

The employee-appellant in Lewis v. Reptile Factory, LLC (D2d3 Oct. 12, 2023 No. B324197) [nonpub. opn.] challenged the trial court’s refusal to issue a statement of decision. The losing party has a right to a statement of decision, but only if timely requested. What is the deadline? There are two: 10 days, normally, but for...

Read More
November 1, 2023
Can a respondent forfeit issues by failing to brief them? A bizarre opinion says yes

A bedrock rule of appellate practice is that an appellant who fails to brief an issue forfeits that issue. That rule applies to appellants. You know, the person challenging the judgment. It does not apply to the respondent—the person defending the judgment. Why? Because a bedrock principle of appellate review is that all intendments and...

Read More
October 31, 2023
Reversals on Technicalities: 4 Recent Examples

Appellate courts are in the affirming business. But be ready to take advantage of easy reversals, like in these examples: 😎 If the court refuses to hold an evidentiary hearing in a contested probate matter, that is (probably) structural error and reversible. 😎 If the court refuses to provide a statement of decision on key...

Read More
October 26, 2023
After Adolph v. Uber, parties “accept the inevitable” and stipulate to reverse

The employer-defendants made good use of the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022). They compelled arbitration of plaintiff-employee’s individual claims, and then got the PAGA claims dismissed. Plaintiff appealed from the dismissal. But then as court watchers anticipated, the California Supreme Court handed down Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc., holding that...

Read More
October 25, 2023
Lack of statement of decision leads to reversal

One advantage to a bench trial is that you are entitled to a statement of decision. This can be better than a jury verdict because a statement of decision includes findings on all material issues. The cross-defendant in the development dispute in Casa Verde Landscaping Maint. Corp. v. Lennary Cmtys. (D4d1 Oct. 24, 2023 D081550)...

Read More
October 24, 2023
How Appellate Lawyers Debate Gun Control and Abortion

Ninth Circuit correspondent Cory Webster joins us to discuss the court’s unusually busy en banc docket and its own species of “shadow docket.” We discuss how parties and judges are moving a few hot-button cases into procedural positions that may suggest what the merits decision will be—but without really touching the merits. We discuss:  ...

Read More
October 23, 2023
Arbitrator reversed for basing credibility on use of interpreter

I will tell you two facts about this recent arbitration case, and let you guess how the Court of Appeal concluded. But be warned: your guess will be wrong. Fact one: The arbitrator found for the buyer (in a dispute over a business sale) based on the arbitrator’s conclusion that the seller’s lack of credibility...

Read More
October 18, 2023
CM/ECF Is Outdated So Get Ready for the 9th Circuit’s ACMS, with Susan Gelmis

Have you ever had trouble e-file something and had someone tell you to try a different web browser? When it comes to the CM/ECF system used by federal courts, that problem has to do with aging technology reliant on “java” plugins, which have security problems. Susan Gelmis, the Chief Deputy Clerk for Operations, explains why...

Read More
October 17, 2023
You can get documents in a Public Records Act, enforced via civil action, but you can’t use a discovery order

After the County of San Benito dragged its feet in responding to a natural resources group’s Public Records Act request about the controversial Strada Verde Project, the group sued for a writ of mandate to enforce their right to transparency. They did have that right, but the court in San Benito v. Superior Court (D6...

Read More
October 16, 2023
You still need a reporter's transcript even if nothing happened at the hearing

If you’re planning to appeal, you need a court reporter at your hearing. But what if the hearing is over a pure question of law, like whether there’s an enforceable arbitration provision? That’s what happened in Olague v. United Care Facilities, LLC (D2d5 Sep. 29. 2023) No. B323075 (nonpub. opn.), involving an appeal from a...

Read More
October 12, 2023
Restraining order against an attorney must be based on multiple instances of non-litigation conduct

A restraining order is available under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 if you have suffered harassment through a “knowing and willful course of conduct” resulting in harassment. And what type of people are more likely to cause a feeling of harassment more than lawyers? So attorney Jacquelynn Hansen got a restraining order against her...

Read More
October 11, 2023
Refusing an evidentiary hearing on contested probate matter is error, and possibly structural error

After a trust beneficiary petitioned for over $1 million in trust distributions in Barbey v. Pnc Bank, N.A. (D2d6 Oct. 10, 2023) No. B325472 (nonpub. opn.), the trustees contested the petition and requested an evidentiary hearing. The probate court refused to hold an evidentiary hearing. Yes, I know “to some persons a million sounds like...

Read More
October 10, 2023
The 9th Cir. “Reimagines” Diversity Jurisdiction

The one sure thing your law-school loans purchased is instant recall of the fact that “federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.” But not as limited today as when you signed your promissory note. We discuss Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLC, the recent 9th Circuit decision holding that specific jurisdiction over a defendant...

Read More
October 9, 2023
Uncivil attorneys get a 40% fee haircut

After a former employee won a claim against the employer in Snoeck v. ExakTime Innovations, Inc., (D2d3 Oct. 2, 2023) No. B321566 (nonpub. opn.), the court granted the motion for attorneys’ fees. The court agreed that the value of counsel’s efforts would have been over $1.1 million. Would have been. But then the court applied...

Read More
October 4, 2023
How to Prepare for Oral Argument

Have an appellate oral argument coming up? We discuss tips shared by top appellate attorneys how to prepare for and give oral arguments. Some tips include: 🗣️ Anticipate the panel’s questions when you can, but… 🗣️ …be prepared to respond when you don’t know the answer. 🗣️ Be prepared to answer: “What is your rule”...

Read More
October 3, 2023
Exclusion of critical impeachment evidence held harmless error because the totality of evidence supported the judgment

At trial, you have a right to impeach an adverse witness’s testimony. The court denied that right in People v. Bingham (D1d5 Sep. 26, 2023) No. A163112 (nonpub. opn.). The court admitted the 911 call of Bingham’s girlfriend reporting that Bingham had beat her up with a lock, but excluded her subsequent statements recanting. That...

Read More
October 2, 2023
Specific Jurisdiction May Be Based on Past Contacts with Forum, Says 9th Circuit Panel over Judge VanDyke Dissent

If you set out to achieve the “impossible,” you are ambitious, but not alone. Impossible Foods, creator of the “Impossible Burger,” learned that another company, Impossible X, was also using the “Impossible” brand on some personal fitness and lifestyle websites, an Amazon platform, and a YouTube channel. But its sole owner-operator, Joel Runyon, lived in...

Read More
September 27, 2023
The Power of Anti-SLAPP Motions: Sept. 2023 Cases

Anti-SLAPP motions are sometimes called early summary judgment motions. But the fact that they are “early” is why they are so powerful: not only do they provide defendants a quick way to defend against claims that involve speech, they force the plaintiff to prove its case without any discovery. On this episode of the California...

Read More
September 26, 2023
Anti-SLAPP denials are appealable as collateral orders, 9th Circuit says

Congress has not enacted an anti-SLAPP statute like the ones in many states, such as California, which prohibit “strategic lawsuits against public participation.” Anti-SLAPP motions protect defendants sued for defamation or the like. But again, there is no federal anti-SLAPP law providing for such a motion. Still, that has proved no problem for the 9th...

Read More
September 22, 2023
Sanctions of $8.7M was voidable, but not void, and so was reinstated on appeal

A lot of savvy litigants search the web for ways to vacate an order after the time to appeal has expired. I know because many of these litigants have found my writings on this subject. Challenges made after the appeal deadline has expired is fruitless, you say? Well, sometimes it can work: section 473 of...

Read More
September 19, 2023
Judges Use Clearbrief & So Should You, with Jackie Schafer

Among the hundreds of great new legal tech available in recent years, Clearbrief stands near the top. Jackie Schafer, a former big-law and state attorney general who had a vision of attorneys and their staff working more effectively and efficiently, designed an app that lives right in your Microsoft Word. Clearbrief lets you upload your...

Read More
September 18, 2023
Pay in 30 days or arbitration is forfeit, and “check is in the mail” does not cut it

So you have been sued and successfully compelled arbitration. Next step: do not fail to ensure your arbitration fees are received within 30 days. Not just paid, but received. The employer-defendant in Doe v. The Superior Court (D1d3 Sep. 8, 2023) No. A167105 put the check in the mail on day 25, but it was...

Read More
September 15, 2023
What does it mean when the appellate court orders counsel to discuss certain authorities at oral argument?

Sometimes in the weeks prior to an appellate oral argument, the court will order the parties to be prepared to discuss certain issues or cases. Sometimes this is called a focus letter or a pre-argument order. They are pretty common in the Ninth Circuit. But a dissent to a pre-argument order is less common. In...

Read More
September 13, 2023
Appeal Your Arbitrator?

We discuss some interesting recent cases out of the California Court of Appeal: Then we discuss the “Eisenberg rule,” and a survey that explains why lawyers still use legalese.   Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed. Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page. Sign up for...

Read More
September 12, 2023
Appeal using the JC form Notice of Appeal nearly gets dismissed

The Judicial Council provides a form Notice of Appeal. But be careful if you use this form because it asks for extra information that could be used to limit the scope of your appeal or cause you to appeal from the wrong order. That is what nearly happened in Lacour v. Marshalls of California (D1d4...

Read More
September 11, 2023
An amended order suspends the right to appeal from the original order

When a judge enters an order, and then later modifies the order, you would probably guess that you should appeal from the modified order. And you would be right. But now try this: Voiding the modified order reinstates the original order, and the time to appeal from the original order has expired. What now? The...

Read More
1 3 4 5 6 7 27
Copyright © 2024 Kowal Law Group
menuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram