Kowal Law Group Logo

Article

Pay in 30 days or arbitration is forfeit, and “check is in the mail” does not cut it

Last updated on September 18, 2023 by Tim Kowal
So you have been sued and successfully compelled arbitration. Next step: do not fail to ensure your arbitration fees are received within 30 days. Not just paid, but received. The employer-defendant in Doe v. The Superior Court (D1d3 Sep. 8, 2023) No. A167105 put the check in the mail on day 25, but it was...Read More >>

What does it mean when the appellate court orders counsel to discuss certain authorities at oral argument?

Last updated on September 15, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Sometimes in the weeks prior to an appellate oral argument, the court will order the parties to be prepared to discuss certain issues or cases. Sometimes this is called a focus letter or a pre-argument order. They are pretty common in the Ninth Circuit. But a dissent to a pre-argument order is less common. In...Read More >>

Appeal using the JC form Notice of Appeal nearly gets dismissed

Last updated on September 12, 2023 by Tim Kowal
The Judicial Council provides a form Notice of Appeal. But be careful if you use this form because it asks for extra information that could be used to limit the scope of your appeal or cause you to appeal from the wrong order. That is what nearly happened in Lacour v. Marshalls of California (D1d4...Read More >>

An amended order suspends the right to appeal from the original order

Last updated on September 11, 2023 by Tim Kowal
When a judge enters an order, and then later modifies the order, you would probably guess that you should appeal from the modified order. And you would be right. But now try this: Voiding the modified order reinstates the original order, and the time to appeal from the original order has expired. What now? The...Read More >>

If the appellate court issues a tentative opinion, do this.

Last updated on September 6, 2023 by Tim Kowal
I have yet to meet an attorney who would not welcome the appellate court providing a tentative opinion prior to oral argument. All upside, no downside, right? There was a downside in Navellier v. Putnam (D1d5 Aug. 17, 2023) No. A166476 (reh’g denied with mods Aug. 30, 2023) (nonpub. opn.). The plaintiffs’ case was dismissed...Read More >>

How to Preserve Appellate Rights in Your Arbitration Agreement

Last updated on September 5, 2023 by Tim Kowal
The worst thing about arbitration is the risk of winding up with a decision contrary to law, facts, and common sense—and, because it’s arbitration, having no meaningful recourse. But that’s just the tradeoff. Right? Actually, that’s not the case. Back in 2008, the California Supreme Court held in Cable Connection, Inc. v. DIRECTV, Inc. (2008)...Read More >>

Court allows losing party to dismiss appeal after unfavorable tentative

Last updated on June 20, 2023 by Tim Kowal
After the record is filed on appeal, you no longer have an absolute right to dismiss the appeal. So if you decide that the the appeal is not worth the risk of attorneys’ fees or bad precedent, you have to request a dismissal. And last month, the Court of Appeal cautioned that if you wait...Read More >>

Can a judge just stay a money judgment?

Last updated on June 19, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Stays of judgment enforcement in California are governed by statute. There are basically only two ways to stay enforcement of a money judgment: (1) post a bond and file a notice of appeal, or (2) ask for a temporary stay under Code of Civil Procedure section 918—but the stay only lasts until the deadline to...Read More >>

When It Comes to Writs of Administrative Mandamus, the Appealability Rules Are Confused (published at CEB)

Last updated on June 15, 2023 by Tim Kowal
CEB has published my article, “When It Comes to Writs of Administrative Mandamus, the Appealability Rules Are Confused,” available here. The article is about the mandamus case of County of Santa Cruz v. Santa Cruz County Civil Service Commission (D6 May 5, 2023 no. H049856) 2023 WL 3267749 (nonpub. opn.). The setup is that, when...Read More >>

Despite a lack of witnesses, letter held to be a will as a matter of law

Last updated on May 31, 2023 by Tim Kowal
A will must be signed by two witnesses. The decedent didn’t do that in Coronado v. Berger (D2d2 May 25, 2023 No. B321347) --- Cal.Rptr. 3d --- (2023 WL 3675787). But there is an exception if the petitioner proves, by clear and convincing evidence, that the decedent intended the document as a will. And here,...Read More >>

Court refuses to dismiss appeal to avoid unfavorable precedent

Last updated on May 25, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Before oral argument in the cannabis-cultivator eviction case of 65283 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLC (D4d2 May 5, 2023 No. E076654) --- Cal.Rptr.3d --- (2023) 2023 WL 3268852, the court issued a tentative opinion—partially certified for publication—against the tenant Coastal Harvest. Rather than have to face this unfavorable precedent in...Read More >>

Defense not asserted in a pretrial order deemed forfeited in split 9th Cir. decision

Last updated on May 24, 2023 by Tim Kowal
In two surprise post-trial moves—likely driven by embedded appellate counsel—a plaintiff first lost her case, then won it back. The employee won her whistleblower claim after a jury trial in I vie v. Astrazenica Pharmaceuticals LP . No. 21-35978, 2023 WL 3563007 (9th Cir. May 19, 2023). But then Astrazenica moved for judgment as a matter...Read More >>

Lack of record leads affirmance by memorandum decision

Last updated on May 22, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Most appellate opinions in California include a full summary of the facts and procedural history, as consistent with the constitutional entitlement to a reasoned opinion. But sometimes the Court of Appeal will issue a mere “memorandum opinion” when the result is compelled by authority on which there is no real question. (People v. Garcia (2002)...Read More >>

Order was file-stamped, but did not attach the POS, so it did not trigger the 60-day deadline to appeal

Last updated on May 17, 2023 by Tim Kowal
The 60-day deadline to appeal begins to run once a party is served with a file-endorsed copy of the judgment that shows the date of service. Sounds simple, but the requirements for that document under California Rules of Court, rule 8.104, can be tricky to meet. A case in point is Construction Industry Force Account...Read More >>

No reporter's transcript, no problem: denial of motion to compel arbitration still reversed on appeal

Last updated on May 15, 2023 by Tim Kowal
I have previously noted that California appellate courts ought to change their practice of requiring an oral record when the appellant does not seek review of any factual findings. (See here, here, and here.) Appellate justices are openly split on this point. (See here.) On the side of relaxing the requirement of having an oral...Read More >>

When it comes to writs of administrative mandamus, the appealability rules are confused

Last updated on May 10, 2023 by Tim Kowal
When challenging an agency action via a writ of administrative mandamus, the trial court’s ruling is the appealable order. If you are going to appeal, do not wait around for a judgment, or you could be too late (like in this previous case). But that is not what happened in the mandamus case of County...Read More >>

Plaintiff appealed but refused to comply with court orders, resulting in dismissal under disentitlement doctrine

Last updated on May 8, 2023 by Tim Kowal
The court in Robertson v. Larkspur Courts (D1d1 May 2, 2023) No. A166818 (nonpub. opn.) could have done worse to the recalcitrant plaintiff than just dismiss his appeal. In this landlord-tenant dispute over a mold issue, the parties stipulated to a judgment. The landlord did its part and paid Robertson $28,000 as agreed. But then...Read More >>

Anti-SLAPP denials are appealable in the 9th Cir., but they shouldn’t be, says Judge Bress

Last updated on May 1, 2023 by Tim Kowal
The film production in which a prop-gun-wielding Alec Baldwin fatally shot the cinematographer spun off a civil lawsuit in Salveson v. Kessler (9th Cir. Mar. 29, 2023) 22-55472 (nonpub. opn.). But as the 9th Circuit holds, the civil case—involving a producer’s claims concerning his former lawyer’s business and tax practices—holds out no issues of public...Read More >>

CEB has my article, What Happens to a Fee Award After the Judgment Is Reversed? Try a Stipulated Reversal

Last updated on April 27, 2023 by Tim Kowal
CEB has published my article, “What Happens to a Fee Award After the Judgment Is Reversed? Try a Stipulated Reversal.” In the short article, I discuss a common confusing scenario: what happens when a judgment is reversed, but the fee award is still on appeal? That is what happened in Mid-Wilshire Property, L.P. v. Dr. Leevil,...Read More >>

File-stamped signed order triggers the 60-day deadline to appeal, even if the file-stamp itself isn’t signed

Last updated on April 26, 2023 by Tim Kowal
The first step to determine whether an appeal is timely is to find out if there was a Rule of Court 8.104(a) “triggering document”—either a “notice of entry” or a file-endorsed (stamped) copy of the judgment showing the date of service. In McKenzie v. Alta Resources Corp. (Apr. 25, 2023 No. G061292) 2023 WL 3067690...Read More >>

When a case turns on credibility, and there is not an oral record, do not even think about appealing

Last updated on April 20, 2023 by Tim Kowal
After dissolving her marriage and entering a marital settlement agreement, Darya Khankin went through some old boxes and found over a million dollars in undisclosed funds she claimed were taken by her ex, Anatoly Dumov. So she moved to set aside the dissolution judgment, noting that under Family Code section 2103, failure to comply with...Read More >>

A stipulated reversal on appeal may allow parties to instruct the trial court

Last updated on April 19, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Sometimes when a case on appeal settles, the settlement will involve stipulating to reversal of the judgment. That much was no surprise in the stipulated reversal of a citizens group’s challenge to the City of Palo Alto’s utility rate structure in **************************Green v. City of Palo Alto (D6 Mar. 27, 2023 no. H049436) 2023 WL...Read More >>

Jury released from duty could not be reconvened to make a remaining finding

Last updated on April 12, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Do not forget to have the jury make all the required findings. Once the jury is discharged, as happened in ***************People v. Jones (D1d5 Apr. 4, 2023) No. A163558, the court loses control of the jury, and so the jury cannot be reconvened. The prosecutor in Jones had charged an enhancement based on a prior...Read More >>

Unlocking Your Case Theme at Oral Argument: Jeff Markowitz with a Minnesota Perspective on Appeals

Last updated on April 11, 2023 by Tim Kowal
You have just about 15-30 seconds at oral argument before the panel is likely to interrupt you. How will you use that time? Minnesota appellate attorney Jeff Markowitz says you should be unlocking that key point that allows the rest of your case to unfold. If you haven’t discovered that point by the time of...Read More >>

“We are not bound by Viking River,” Cal. appellate court holds

Last updated on April 10, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Commentators have predicted that California appellate courts would thumb their nose at the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 holding in Viking River. Viking River was the case that abrogated the California rule of Iskanian, and held instead that employers could enforce waivers of representative PAGA claims. And thumb its nose is just what the Second District...Read More >>

Use a settled statement to fill gaps in your record (but don’t try to rewrite the record)

Last updated on April 4, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Nice try, but this is not what a settled statement is for. The defendant in **********Rok Mobile, Inc. v. Brannon (D2d2 Mar. 24, 2023 No. B308642) 2023 WL 2621771 was served with a complaint but failed to answer. In October, Brannon went into default, and five months later got a default judgment against him. On...Read More >>

Oral record on appeal was required to review the validity of a trustee notice to beneficiaries

Last updated on April 3, 2023 by Tim Kowal
We are in the middle of a nationwide shortage of court reporters. Probate departments recently have stopped providing court reporters. California needs 2,750 new court reporters to fill its gap. One thing that would help (as I suggested in a recent presentation) would be for the appellate courts not to insist on an oral record...Read More >>

$37k in discovery sanctions appealable, but not the related issue sanctions

Last updated on March 29, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Discovery orders can sometimes be devastating. But are they appealable? Rarely. But under the appealability statute, CCP 904.1, sanctions orders greater than $5,000 are appealable. That gave the defendants in *********************************Deck v. Developers Investment Co., Inc. (D4d3 Mar. 24, 2023 No. G061287) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ an idea. The defendants got hit with issue sanctions for...Read More >>

Can You Read It Back? Tackling Court Reporter Scarcity in California

Last updated on March 27, 2023 by Tim Kowal
CEB has published my CLE presentation, “Can You Read It Back? Tackling Court Reporter Scarcity in California.” You can watch the presentation here (though you will need a subscription). Here is a summary: My most frequent advice as an appellate attorney: “Don’t forget to get a court reporter.” This wisdom of this advice—the most oft-dispensed...Read More >>

The 60-day appellate deadline runs from mailing—receipt is irrelevant

Last updated on March 22, 2023 by Tim Kowal
Trick Question: You have 180 days to appeal if no one serves a notice of entry or a file-stamped copy of the judgment. You never received one of those documents. So you have 180 days to appeal, right? Wrong. Or at least, you can’t be so sure. That’s what the defendants learned in Dannelley v....Read More >>
Copyright © 2024 Kowal Law Group
menuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram