Kowal Law Group Logo

The Kowal Law Group

Not your typical law firm—we are inspired to bring a unique perspective to our practice. Together, we stand as guardians of justice, ready to champion your appeals with unmatched determination and wisdom.

Teddy T. Davis

Attorney
[email protected](949) 676-9989
BAR ADMISSIONS

California
Supreme Court of California
U.S. Court Central District of California

ASSOCIATIONS

Orange County Bar Association

Teddy T. Davis has practiced law in California since 2003. His practice focuses primarily on complex business litigation from pre-filing investigation through appeal. Mr. Davis has consistently achieved success representing clients in actions involving disputes concerning complex business matters, contracts, homeowners associations, product liability, and real estate.

In the course of representing his clients, Mr. Davis has acquired a broad range of legal experience, including significant trial and arbitration experience, where he has handled all aspects of litigation from the preparation of pleadings through settlement and judgment. Additionally, Mr. Davis has authored multiple briefs and motions and argued before the Court of Appeal. As a result of his efforts, the Court of Appeal have rendered decisions preserving Mr. Davis’s clients’ trial court victories and overturning judgments against them.

Immediately before joining The Kowal Law Group, Mr. Davis was an Associate at Thomas Vogele & Associates. Before that, Mr. Davis headed a litigation team at Helton Law Group that represented medical care providers in reimbursement disputes with health care insurance companies, and was a senior litigation associate at Enterprise Counsel Group in Irvine.

C&C Properties, et al. v. Shell Pipeline Co., et al. (E.D.Cal. 2019) (pipeline easement dispute resulting in $40 million judgment upon jury verdict in favor of client real estate developers)
#1 Verdict in California for Trespass and Top 20 Verdict for All Categories

Domingo Villas, Inc., et al. v. Tarnutzer (Cal.Ct.App. 2019) ($1.9 million judgment upon jury verdict reversed in favor of client real estate developer)

Yang v. Sui, et al. (San Bernardino Sup.Ct. 2018) ($10 million jury verdict in favor of client online retail business owner)
#1 Verdict in California for Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Conversion

Dohr v. Lintz (Cal.Ct.App. 2019) (complete defense of $25 million in claims against more than 20 defendants based on alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and fraud, including three appeals)

Shapiro v. Dohr (Cal.Ct.App. 2017) ($5.1 million judgment in promissory note dispute reversed in favor of client real estate developer)

Casey v. Ferrante et al. (C.D.Bkr. 2015) (invalidated QPRT trust in first-of-its-kind ruling in favor of client Chapter 7 trustee)

Peterson v. Rubio (Cal.Ct.App. 2015) (rescission ordered by Court of Appeal in favor of elderly client borrower)

Citizens for a Fair Trash Contract v. City of Los Alamitos (O.C.Sup.Ct. 2011) (invalidating city trash contract on behalf of client citizen group)

Choi v. Orange County Great Park Corp. (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 524 (awarding attorneys' fees to client citizen group in suit enforcing public disclosure concerning the Irvine Great Park)

Tim Kowal, “Restraining Order Against an Attorney Must Be Based on Multiple Instances of Non-Litigation Conduct,” CEB DailyNews (Jan. 22, 2024 ).

Tim Kowal, “State wins a writ excusing it from disclosing whether its private research firm engaged in animal cruelty,” CEB DailyNews (Feb. 7, 2024).

Tim Kowal, “Arbitrator reversed for basing credibility on use of interpreter,” CEB DailyNews (Jan. 5, 2024).

Tim Kowal, “Lack of statement of decision leads to reversal” CEB DailyNews (Dec. 14, 2023).

Tim Kowal, “Specific Jurisdiction May Be Based on Past Contacts with Forum, Says 9th Circuit Panel over Judge VanDyke Dissent,” CEB Daily News  (Dec. 6, 2023).

Tim Kowal, “Sanctions of $8.7M was voidable, but not void, and so was reinstated on appeal,” CEB DailyNews (Nov. 30, 2023).

Tim Kowal, “Pay in 30 Days or Arbitration Is Forfeit—and 'Check Is in the Mail' Does Not Cut It,” CEB (Nov. 15, 2023).

Tim Kowal, “How to Preserve Appellate Rights in Your Arbitration Agreement,” CEB (Nov. 9, 2023).

Tim Kowal, “When It Comes to Writs of Administrative Mandamus, the Appealability Rules Are Confused,” CEB (Jun. 1, 2023)

Tim Kowal, “What Happens to a Fee Award After the Judgment Is Reversed? Try a Stipulated Reversal,” CEB (Apr. 26, 2023).

Tim Kowal, “Can You Read It Back? Tackling Court Reporter Scarcity in California,” CEB (March 17, 2023),

Tim Kowal, “Appeal Filed One Minute Late—Literally One Minute—Dismissed As Untimely,” CEB (Mar. 6, 2023),

Tim Kowal, “Ten Trial Tips from an Appellate Specialist,” CLE presentation, San Francisco Lawyers Network (Feb. 16, 2023).

Tim Kowal, “There Is No Such Thing As a “Corporate Representative” or “Person Most Qualified” Witness,” CEB (Feb. 3, 2023),

Tim Kowal, “SLAPP Fee Award Held Not Appealable If SLAPP Order Itself Is Not Appealed,” CEB (Dec. 22, 2022),

Tim Kowal, “Personal Jurisdiction Unnecessary to Issue Judgment on an Out-of-State Judgment, New Published CA Case Holds,” CEB (Dec. 6, 2022)

Tim Kowal, “Settlement Offer Under Section 998 Automatically Expires If Judge Grants Summary Judgment,” CEB (Nov. 15, 2022)

Tim Kowal, “MSJ Evidence Rulings Are Discretionary, California Appellate Court Holds in Split of Authority,” CEB (Nov. 10, 2022)

Tim Kowal, “Don’t Seek Default Without Notifying Opposing Counsel,” CEB (Oct. 26, 2022).

Tim Kowal, “Preparing the Appendix in Federal Appeals,” NALA, Q3 2022 Facts & Findings (Aug. 2022)

Tim Kowal, “Supreme Court Affirms the Use of Powerful Civil-Theft Remedies Under Penal Code 496 in Business-Tort Cases," CEB (Aug. 3, 2022)

Tim Kowal, Are anti-SLAPP Fee Awards Automatically Stayed Pending Appeal? The Better Side of a Split of Authority Says Yes, 35 Cal. Litig. No. 1 (Spring 2022)

Tim Kowal, "Excluding Expert's Rebuttal Opinion Can Be Grounds to Reverse Jury Verdict," CEB (Jun. 3, 2022)

Tim Kowal, “Draft Your RFAs With Costs of Proof and Settlement in Mind,” CEB (May 13, 2022) 

Tim Kowal, “'Gamesmanship' Throughout Litigation May Raise Risk of Sanctions on Appeal,” CEB (Apr. 1, 2022)

Tim Kowal (Presenter), “Preparing the Excerpts of Record for Federal Appeals,” NALA (Mar. 24, 2022)

Tim Kowal, “A Trap for the Unwary: Order on a Post-Settlement Fee Motion May Be Nonappealable,” CEB (Jan. 28, 2022)

Tim Kowal, “The Risks of Serving Too Many Interrogatories,” CEB (Sep. 24, 2021)

Tim Kowal, “Don't Fall Into the "No Statement of Decision" Trap,” CEB (Dec. 17, 2021)

Tim Kowal, “Making Sense of the California Supreme Court's Publication Rules,” CEB (May 21, 2021)

Tim Kowal, “Something You Didn't Know About 998 Offers,” CEB (Apr. 30, 2021)

Timothy M. Kowal and Brendan M. Loper, A Defense Lawyer’s Complaint: Some Judges Don’t Get It About Judicial Admissions, Verdict (2018 vol. 2)

Don't Be an Activist, Be a Neighbor: How to Persuade Your City Council, presented at the 12th Annual Golden West College Peace Conference: Peace and the Global Economy: Emerging Issues & Practical Solutions (Apr. 2018)

Timothy M. Kowal, Dirty Work: Disgorging the Profits of Trespassing Pipelines, Orange County Lawyer (Oct. 2017)

Who Will Redevelop Redevelopment?: Power and Pragmatism in California Redevelopment Law, 12 ALB. L. ENVTL. OUTLOOK J. 93 (2007)

Rethinking Eminent Domain: The Restitutionary Approach to Just Compensation, 9 CHAP. L. REV. 463 (2006) (Winner, First Prize, Pacific Legal Foundation, Seventh Annual Judicial Awareness Writing Competition, 2006)

"At common law, barratry was 'the offense of frequently exciting and stirring up suits and quarrels' (4 Blackstone, Commentaries 134) and was punished as a misdemeanor."

Rubin v. Green (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1187

Copyright © 2024 Kowal Law Group
menuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram