Kowal Law Group Logo
legal bumbling sword

"Submit"​ on a Tentative, But Do Not "Stipulate"​ to a Tentative

Tim Kowal     December 30, 2020

When the trial court issues a tentative ruling, counsel often will "submit" on the tentative and give no further argument. On occasion I have noticed counsel saying they "stipulate" to the tentative. I have always taken this as a slip of tongue of no real consequence.

Do not be misled: there is a consequence. "Stipulating" to a tentative acquiesces in it, waiving further arguments against it. "Submitting" on a tentative is neutral, and is not a waiver. 

So observed the Fourth Appellate district, Division One in Lave v. Charter Commc'ns, LLC (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2020) No. D076206. After prevailing in on a wrongful termination and FEHA case, plaintiff sought attorney fees of $532,000, doubled to over $1 million based on a lodestar calculation.

In its tentative ruling, the trial court refused to apply a lodestar, and reduced the attorneys' hourly rates, and awarded $400,000. At the hearing, plaintiff's counsel stated he would "stipulate to the tentative" and made no further argument.

On appeal, plaintiff argued the trial court made a mathematical error in computing the total award.

The Fourth District held plaintiff had forfeited the issue by not raising it in the trial court, emphasizing counsel's "stipulation" to the tentative ruling. The court cited Mundy v. Lenc (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 1401, 1406, in which the Second District rejected a similar claim of forfeiture when the appellant had "submitted" on a tentative. That is different, because “[s]ubmission on a tentative ruling is neutral; it conveys neither agreement nor disagreement with the analysis,” and appellant's arguments had been preserved in the briefing below.

In Lave, however, appellant had "acquiesce[d] in the order by stipulating to the tentative."

The Court also notes that the trial court need not provide a mathematical analysis, or any analysis at all, in support of a fee award. But had the trial court committed a mathematical error over appellant's duly-raised objection, it would have been reversible. "Stipulating" to the tentative and not raising the computation objection lost the appeal here.

Tim Kowal helps trial attorneys and clients win their cases and avoid error on appeal. He co-hosts the Cal. Appellate Law Podcast at www.CALPodcast.com, and publishes a newsletter of appellate tips for trial attorneys at www.tvalaw.com/articles. Contact Tim at [email protected] or (714) 641-1232.

Tim Kowal is an appellate specialist certified by the California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization. Tim helps trial attorneys and clients win their cases and avoid error on appeal. He co-hosts the Cal. Appellate Law Podcast at CALpodcast.com, and publishes summaries of cases and appellate tips for trial attorneys. Contact Tim at [email protected] or (949) 676-9989.
Get “Not To Be Published,” a weekly digest of these articles, delivered directly to your inbox!

"God made the angels to show Him splendor, … Man He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of his mind."

— Sir Thomas More in Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons

"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."

— Plato (427-347 B.C.)

"A judge is a law student who grades his own papers."

— H.L. Mencken

"Moot points have to be settled somehow, once they get thrust upon us. If an assertion cannot be proved, then it must be settled some other way, and nearly all of these ways are unfair to somebody."

—T.H. White, The Once and Future King

“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?”

— James Madison, Federalist 62

Show neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your fellow men justly.


"At common law, barratry was 'the offense of frequently exciting and stirring up suits and quarrels' (4 Blackstone, Commentaries 134) and was punished as a misdemeanor."

Rubin v. Green (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1187

"Upon putting laws into writing, they became even harder to change than before, and a hundred legal fictions rose to reconcile them with reality."

— Will Durant

"So far as the beginnings of law had theories, the first theory of liability was in terms of a duty to buy off the vengeance of him to whom an injury had been done whether by oneself or by something in one's power. The idea is put strikingly in the Anglo-Saxon legal proverb, 'Buy spear from side or bear it,' that is, buy off the feud or fight it out."

— Roscoe Pound, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law

"It may be that the court is thought to be excessively legalistic. I should be sorry to think that it is anything else."

— Hon. Sir Owen Dixon, Chief Justice of Australia

"Counsel on the firing line in an actual trial must be prepared for surprises, including requests for amendments of pleading. They cannot ask that a judgment afterwards obtained be set aside merely because their equilibrium was slightly disturbed by an unexpected motion."

Posz v. Burchell (1962) 209 Cal.App.2d 324, 334

Copyright © 2024 Kowal Law Group
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram