
Here are a few cases I did not have time to write up but seemed either important or irritating enough to mention:
Elected officials aren't whistleblowers, Cal. Supreme Court says. “Employee” means rank-and-file public workers, not elected officials who “report to the electorate.” But: they can still bring First Amendment claims. Brown v. City of Inglewood (Cal., July 7, 2025, No. S280773)
Filing an anti-SLAPP motion? It better include the memo. New published case says a timely notice, but followed by an untimely memorandum, does not cut it. Mora v. Menjivar (111 Cal.App.5th 1237 June 12, 2025 No. A169997)
Property tax increase under local ordinance require majority property-owner votes. City’s tax hike is coming up short on votes, so city casts the votes to make the difference based on city-owned parcels. Court says sure, why not, cities are people too. Dessins LLC v. City of Sacramento (Cal. Ct. App., July 9, 2025, No. C100644)
Out: Res Judicata. In: Claim Preclusion. Get the lingo, says the Court of Appeal: “[a]lthough the parties and the trial court used the term res judicata, the correct modern term is claim preclusion.” (A. B. v. County of San Diego, f. 2, Citing Samara v. Matar (2018) 5 Cal.5th 322, 326.) (h/t Yisrael Gelb.)
(Artwork by Randall Holbrook, RNDL.DESIGN.)