
Here are a few cases I did not have time to write up but seemed either important or irritating enough to mention:
The last resort to reverse a judgment when all other lights go out? Writ of coram nobis. A 9th Circuit panel, denying relief after Supreme Court confirmed that certain jury instructions on subjective intent (like the one here) are wrong, offers three views: Judge Miller’s majority (the doctrine’s door is narrowly ajar for exceptional cases, but this is not it), Judge Nelson’s concurrence (FRCP remedies slammed the door to coram nobis claims), and Judge Desai’s dissent (the doctrine should be broader). Cervantes-Torres v. United States (9th Cir., June 24, 2025, No. 23-55617)
Don't dismiss without a release of costs: Homeowner dropped HOA suit, but got stuck with $150k in fees when HOA was determined the prevailing party. JENNINGS, v. BAYSIDE COURT OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. (D1d5, June 27, 2025, No. A171339) (non-pub. opn.)
No findings = sanctions reversed! But don't get too excited: on remand, the trial court can supplement the order with findings why the frivolous SLAPP motion supported sanctions. SZETO, v. SUNG YI. (D4d3, July 2, 2025, No. G064497) (non-pub. opn.)
How to sanction an attorney fact witness: Not the Rule 11 clumsy 21-day safe harbor. Instead, cite 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and say the attorney has “multiplie[d] the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously.” Defendant general counsel withdrew an erroneous declaration but still got sanctioned, affirmed on appeal. Rowland v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. (9th Cir., July 7, 2025, No. 24-5196)
(Artwork by Randall Holbrook, RNDL.DESIGN.)