CEB Dailynews has published my article, “Prevailing on a Contract Affirmative Defense Gives Rise to Civ. Code § 1717 Fees.” The article is about what happens when you prevail on a contract, but the contract is only raised as an affirmative defense—and not as a claim. The Supreme Court previously said no: an affirmative defense is not a Civil Code section 1717 “action.” But clarifying that rule, Am. Bldg. Innovation v. Balfour Beatty Constr. (D4d3 Sep. 3, 2024) No. G062471 [pub. opn.] holds that prevailing on a contract-based affirmative defense can give rise to contractual attorneys’ fees, resulting in an award of $1.55 million.
The difference is that the affirmative defense was based on the same contract as in the plaintiff’s complaint. So the “claim on a contract” element was met here.
But an affirmative defense on a contract is still not the same thing as a “claim on a contract.” So if you are asserting an affirmative defense based on a contract and want to establish a right to fees, consider also filing a cross-claim for declaratory relief on the contract. That way if you win, the winning theory is part of a “claim on a contract,” triggering a right to fees.
The original article is here.