Here are a few cases I did not have time to write up but seemed either important or irritating enough to mention:
Teaching yoga is just like teaching Shakespeare, for First Amendment purposes. 9th Circuit strikes down San Diego’s beach yoga class ban. Hubbard v. City of San Diego (9th Cir., June 4, 2025, No. 24-4613)
Not enough time for the CCP 128.5 21-day date harbor? Nothing prevents asking for a continuance of the underlying motion. JUNKERS2JEWELS, LLC, et al., v. LA-DORIS MCCLANEY, (Cal. Ct. App., May 28, 2025, No. B339900) (non-pub. opn.)
Yet another fee order reversed because trial court needs to give more reasoning to justify the “haircut.” (Tip: Help the court by proposing bullet-point key reasons in your brief conclusion or a proposed order.) Perry v. Stuart (Cal. Ct. App., May 27, 2025, No. H051093)
Judgment enforcement fees reminder: appellate fees in defending underlying judgment are not collectible under the Enforcement of Judgments Act, because they are not for “enforcement.” EDWARD H. BONIN, v. LINCOLN CHAYES et al., (D2d2, May 29, 2025, No. B340106) (non-pub. opn.)
(Artwork by Randall Holbrook, RNDL.DESIGN.)