“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?”
— James Madison, Federalist 62
At the OCBA's Appellate Section event last week, the Presiding Justices from each of the three divisions of the Fourth Appellate District provided some inside baseball on their respective divisions: Justice Judith McConnell from Division One (San Diego), Justice Manuel Ramirez from Division Two (Riverside), and Justice Kathleen O'Leary from Division Three (Santa Ana). Some highlights:
Caseloads:
Div. 1: Crim. 45%; Civ. 48%; Juv. 7% (down from 20-25%; they don't know why)
Div. 2: Crim. 50%; Civ. 45%; Juv. 5%
Div. 3: Crim. 30%; Civ. 55%; Juv. 15%
Appearing Remotely:
Div. 1 is on video using WebX
Div. 2 is on video using BlueJeans
Div. 3 is still phone-only, hopes to be on video in Nov.
I'm sure the justices wish this went without saying: when appearing remotely, please don’t appear in front of an unmade bed or a sink of dirty dishes. Dress professionally.
Justices are conferring about cases via email, and the conferences are not as robust as in the robing room. But there is no estimate when normal will return.
Budgets are in crisis, and video imposes new costs. This may impact workloads.
Thanks to Geelan Fahimy , Marco A. Pulido , and Jenny Hua for putting this on.
#appeals #appellate #attorneys