There is a small but growing number of cases holding that incivility can bite you in your attorneys’ fees motions. But are the courts serious about that? Mess around and find out, is the lesson from Madison v. Theodore (D2d7, Jan. 8, 2025, No. B310551) [nonpub. opn.].
During a long court trial, the proceedings "took an uncivil turn" and were "filled with endless argumentum ad hominem attacks on the witnesses and on opposing counsel." The trial court reduced the attorneys’ fee request by $340,850 for this incivility and abusive litigation tactics.
While the reduction was not challenged—and thus the tactics were not detailed—the reduction was based on the principle from Karton v. Ari Design & Construction, Inc., which held that civility is an aspect of attorney skill and should be considered when determining fee awards. "Civility is an aspect of skill," says Karton.
"Excellent lawyers deserve higher fees, and excellent lawyers are civil.”
The corollary: uncivil attorneys can expect big fee haircuts.