add_action( 'wp_enqueue_scripts', 'remove_my_global_styles' ); function remove_my_global_styles() { wp_dequeue_style( 'global-styles' ); }
Here are a few cases I did not have time to write up but seemed either important or irritating enough to mention:
Can an attorney sign as to only part of a pleading? Alan Dershowitz signed a complaint. The complaint contained frivolous allegations. But wait! Dershowitz says he was only “of counsel” and was only responsible for paragraph number 8, which was not frivolous. A 9th Circuit panel reversed the sanction because it is unclear whether Rule 11 liability applies to “of counsel.” Going forward, Judge Gould for the majority says yes. Judge Bumatay says no. Lake v. Gates (9th Cir. - March 17, 2025), h/t Prof. Shaun Martin.
Are articles of impeachment "attacks" on judicial independence? Bloomberg Law has: US Judges Speak Out Against Republican Impeachment Push, and Law.com has Federal Appellate Judges Denounce Threats, Impeachment Efforts, quoting Sixth Circuit Jeffrey Sutton: "Criticism is no surprise. It's part of the job.” "But I do think when it gets to the level of a threat, it really is about attacking judicial independence, and that's just not good for the system or the country.”
Comment: True, but our system is full of both democratic and counter-democratic checks, with judicial impeachment being one of the few democratic checks against an otherwise independent judiciary. (The other: court-packing schemes! Another: jury nullification!) Also, in all U.S. history, only 15 federal judges have ever been impeached, with eight being convicted by the Senate and removed. I’d wonder who believes those numbers are too high.
SLAPP fee orders are not appealable: True, the SLAPP order itself (partial grant, partial denial) is appealable. But the subsequent fee order is not. Ali v. Dignity Health. (2D5d. Dec. 31, 2024 No. B331058). (nonpub. opn.).
(Artwork by Randall Holbrook, RNDL.DESIGN.)