The employee-appellant in Lewis v. Reptile Factory, LLC (D2d3 Oct. 12, 2023 No. B324197) [nonpub. opn.] challenged the trial court’s refusal to issue a statement of decision. The losing party has a right to a statement of decision, but only if timely requested. What is the deadline? There are two: 10 days, normally, but for shorter trials—within a day, or if over multiple days, under 8 hours—the request must be on the record before submitting.
The trial here was two days. And appellant made the request within 10 days. So the request was timely, right?
Wrong. The trial was done over two partial days. So the court appropriately asked: was it done is under eight hours?
The transcript for one of the partial days the proceedings began at 10:04 a.m. and concluded at 3:50 p.m. That’s almost six hours. So as long as the trial on the other day was a little over two hours, the appellant was home free, right?
Wrong again. First, the transcript did not reflect the length of the lunch recess. (Recesses don’t count toward the eight hours.) Worse, the other transcript did not reflect duration at all.
And then these words of doom: “Error is never presumed.” “[T]he record in the present case does not affirmatively show that the trial of this matter lasted more than eight hours.”
That means the request for a statement of decision needed to be made before the end of trial. The request after the tentative decision was untimely.
Here are three tips to consider at your next short trial:
Just don’t let your right to a statement of decision evaporate by an untimely request.