Kowal Law Group Logo
Hour Glass

Clerk's Notice Did Not Trigger Shorter Deadline to File Posttrial Motion, Second District Holds

Tim Kowal     December 8, 2020

Posttrial motions are a procedural minefield. Today's example: whether you have 180 days to file your posttrial motion, or a mere 15 days, depends on the fine print in the clerk's notice of entry.

The case is Simgel Co. v. Jaguar Land Rover N. Am. (D2d8 Oct. 1, 2020) No. B292458 (opens in new tab). It is a lemon law case where the jury completed an ill-prepared verdict form to award plaintiff $26k in rescission damages. Judgment was entered. Entry of judgment sets up a 180-day deadline to file a notice of intent to move for new trial, to set aside and vacate under CCP 663, or for JNOV.

But the clerk served a notice of entry of judgment. A notice of entry sets up a tight 15-day deadline to file the notice of intent.

Here, the defendant filed its notice of intent 20 days later. Too late. The defendant missed the deadline, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

But wait, says the Second District. We have to take a closer look at the clerk's notice of entry. That is because the clerk cannot alter the jurisdictional deadline just on the clerk's own. Instead, the clerk's notice is only effective if that notice was provided “upon order of the court” or “under § 664.5.” The Supreme Court so held in Van Beurden Ins. Services, Inc. v Customized Worldwide Weather Ins. Agency, Inc. (1997) 15 Cal. 4th 51.

Held: The clerk's notice of entry was not effective to trigger the 15-day deadline, thus the 180-day deadline applied and the defendant's posttrial motions were timely. And the defendant's arguments were well-taken, thus the judgment was reversed.

Had the plaintiff filed its own notice of entry instead of relying on the clerk's, the outcome may have been different.

(Note this advice, about the plaintiff serving a notice of entry instead, does not apply in family law cases involving dissolution, nullity, legal separation, child custody/support, or parental relationship cases. In such cases, the clerk is required to serve the Notice of Entry on form FL-190. CRC 5.413, CCP 664.5(a). A party Notice of Entry is inapplicable. Also, in pro per cases, the clerk is required to serve the Notice of Entry. CCP 664.5(b).)

A further note: The deadline for the court to rule on a new trial motion (75 days under new CCP 660) does not start unless the notice of entry or clerk's mailing affirmatively states notice was given "upon order by the court" or "under CCP 664.5". CCP 660.

A still further note: Other than for posttrial motions and other special cases, the general rule is that the service of a clerk's notice of mailing of the file-stamped order triggers the 60-day deadline to appeal under 8.104, even if not ordered by court per CCP 664.5.

Posttrial motions are a good time to consult appellate counsel!

Tim Kowal is an appellate specialist certified by the California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization. Tim helps trial attorneys and clients win their cases and avoid error on appeal. He co-hosts the Cal. Appellate Law Podcast at CALpodcast.com, and publishes summaries of cases and appellate tips for trial attorneys. Contact Tim at [email protected] or (949) 676-9989.
Get “Not To Be Published,” a weekly digest of these articles, delivered directly to your inbox!
Subscribe

"God made the angels to show Him splendor, … Man He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of his mind."

— Sir Thomas More in Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons

"At common law, barratry was 'the offense of frequently exciting and stirring up suits and quarrels' (4 Blackstone, Commentaries 134) and was punished as a misdemeanor."

Rubin v. Green (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1187

"So far as the beginnings of law had theories, the first theory of liability was in terms of a duty to buy off the vengeance of him to whom an injury had been done whether by oneself or by something in one's power. The idea is put strikingly in the Anglo-Saxon legal proverb, 'Buy spear from side or bear it,' that is, buy off the feud or fight it out."

— Roscoe Pound, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law

Show neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your fellow men justly.

Leviticus

"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."

— Plato (427-347 B.C.)

"Counsel on the firing line in an actual trial must be prepared for surprises, including requests for amendments of pleading. They cannot ask that a judgment afterwards obtained be set aside merely because their equilibrium was slightly disturbed by an unexpected motion."

Posz v. Burchell (1962) 209 Cal.App.2d 324, 334

"A judge is a law student who grades his own papers."

— H.L. Mencken

"Upon putting laws into writing, they became even harder to change than before, and a hundred legal fictions rose to reconcile them with reality."

— Will Durant

“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?”

— James Madison, Federalist 62

"Moot points have to be settled somehow, once they get thrust upon us. If an assertion cannot be proved, then it must be settled some other way, and nearly all of these ways are unfair to somebody."

—T.H. White, The Once and Future King

"It may be that the court is thought to be excessively legalistic. I should be sorry to think that it is anything else."

— Hon. Sir Owen Dixon, Chief Justice of Australia

Copyright © 2024 Kowal Law Group
menuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram