CEB DailyNews has published my article, “Sanctions of $8.7M was voidable, but not void, and so was reinstated on appeal.” The article is about In re the Marriage of Jensen (D2d2 Sep. 5, 2023) No. B320565 (nonpub. opn.), which distinguished void from voidable judgments. What makes a judgment or order “voidable” or “void” can be an important question, given the six-month period to challenge a “voidable” judgment, and a limitless period to challenge a “void” judgment.
In the article, I note that the courts’ efforts to articulate the distinction have been, at best, subtle.
The original article is here.