CEB DailyNews has published my article, “Does 998 cost-shifting apply to settlements? A three-way split?” The article is about the Lemon Law case in Ayers v. FCA US, LLC (D2d8 Feb. 27, 2024 No. B315884), where the parties settled for less than defendant’s 998 offer. In a published opinion. the court held that, contrary to the plaintiff’s textual interpretation, “judgment or award” does not mean settlement. Instead, “a plain reading” yields the conclusion that the “more favorable judgment or award” language merely refers to a more favorable “terminat[ion].”
So if you settle for less than the 998 offer you rejected, prepare to get hit with the 998 penalties.
But note that the Supreme Court has granted review in Madrigal on this question. Which is why Justice Viramontes dissented.
The original article is here.