Kowal Law Group Logo

Diverse Perspectives

| article | | Legal News | | podcast | | Videos |

Tag: Respondent Arguments

November 1, 2023
Can a respondent forfeit issues by failing to brief them? A bizarre opinion says yes

A bedrock rule of appellate practice is that an appellant who fails to brief an issue forfeits that issue. That rule applies to appellants. You know, the person challenging the judgment. It does not apply to the respondent—the person defending the judgment. Why? Because a bedrock principle of appellate review is that all intendments and […]

Read More
March 28, 2023
Top Tips for Respondents on Appeal to Get Your Judgment Affirmed

As the prevailing party defending an order on appeal, you know the odds are in your favor. Statistically, 75-80% of judgments are affirmed on appeal. But 25% is still worse odds than Russian Roulette. So on this episode of the California Appellate Law Podcast, Jeff and I discuss some tips to seize maximum advantage of […]

Read More
November 3, 2021
Order Denying Arbitration Reversed, Trial Court Must Decide Existence of Arbitration Agreement First — But a Strong Dissent Disagrees

This will surprise appellate attorneys. The Court of Appeal in Pettie v. Amazon.com, Inc. (D4d2 Sep. 21, 2021) 2021 WL 4270631 (no. E074241) (nonpub. opn.) recently reversed an order denying a motion to compel arbitration — but not because the trial court did not cite valid grounds to deny the motion. Instead, the majority reversed because the […]

Read More
August 31, 2021
Trial Court Has No Discretion to Consider an Untimely (by Three Years!) Anti-SLAPP Motion, Appellate Court Holds

Three years and one SLAPP appeal into litigation over a commercial real estate dispute, defendants filed a second anti-SLAPP motion in in Newport Harbor Offices & Marina, LLC v. Morris Cerullo World Evangelism (D4d3 Aug. 20, 2021) 2021 WL 3700752 [no. G058687] (nonpub. opn.). But the statute says anti-SLAPP motions must be filed within 60 days […]

Read More
March 23, 2021
Appellate Court Holds Respondent Forfeited Issues and Failed to Establish Implied Findings

In another cautionary tale for respondents on appeal, the Second District in this appeal of an order denying arbitration holds the trial court erred in finding an arbitration agreement unenforceable. The opinion in Alvarez v. Altamed Health Servs. (D2d8 Feb. 4, 2021) No. B305155 (published) suggests a couple ways respondents might try to shore up potential defects in […]

Read More
March 22, 2021
Judgment Against Nonparties Reversed; Respondent Held to Have Waived Arguments

Waiver or forfeiture of arguments is a big concern for appellants on an appeal. But rarely do courts find that a respondent had waived or forfeited an argument. In Travis v. Brand (D2d8 Mar. 19, 2021) 2021 WL 1049863 (published), various citizens, political action committees, and elected officials, and other political operatives litigated over whether to redevelop the Redondo Beach waterfront. […]

Read More
March 17, 2021
Tip When Defending a Judgment on Appeal: Do Not Argue Issues the Appellant Waived

Here is a tip if you are defending a judgment: If appellants fail to raise an issue, do not raise it for them. That is what happened in Foster v. American Marine Svs Group Benefit Plan, 2021 WL 930257 (9th Cir. Mar. 11, 2021). As a result of respondent/appellee's helpful assist in raising the dispositive issue […]

Read More
March 16, 2021
Stipulated Judgment and Waiver of Right to Appeal Did Not Result in Dismissal of Appeal

Settlements of litigation sometimes involve a provision to enter a stipulated judgment in the event the defendant fails to perform. A judgment entered upon stipulation typically is not subject to challenge on appeal, as the stipulation means the appellant is not "aggrieved," and thus lacks standing. That was not the case in Park Lane Assocs., LP […]

Read More
January 12, 2021
"Woefully Deficient"​ Appellate Argument Failed to Comply with Appellate Rules, Leading to Affirmance

Last week, Bryan Garner's LawProse lesson was on succinctness, noting that the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg once told him that "Eye fatigue sets in well before page 50." The appellant in Semmerling v. Bormann, No. 19-3211 (7th Cir. Jan. 5, 2021) was not in danger of reaching page 50. Instead, he kind of went a […]

Read More

Tags

Abuse of Discretion (24)
ADA and Unruh Accessibility Actions (2)
Administrative Law (1)
Admission of Improper Evidence (10)
Alter Ego (2)
Amicus Briefs (3)
Anecdotes (1)
Anti-SLAPP (38)
Appealability (8)
Appealability and Appealable Orders (45)
Appealable Orders (4)
Appeals Dismissed (2)
Appeals Treated as Writs (4)
Appellate Bonds (8)
Appellate Briefing (11)
Appellate Practice (8)
Appellate Sanctions (15)
Arbitration (31)
Art of Persuasion (1)
Attorney Client Privilege (2)
Attorney Fees (22)
Attorney Fees - CCP 1021.5 (1)
Attorney Feese (1)
Attorney Misconduct (1)
Bankruptcy (1)
Benefits Obtained Trespass Damages (1)
Briefing (18)
California Supreme Court (23)
CCP 998 Offers (12)
Civil Code 3334 (1)
Civil Theft (2)
Civility (18)
Class Actions (4)
Clear and Convincing (2)
Clerks Service of File Stamped Judgment (1)
Closing Argument (1)
Collateral Orders (16)
Comments (2)
Common Interest Doctrine (1)
Consenting to Judgments (1)
Constitutional Law (4)
Constitutional Litigation (1)
Contempt (3)
Court Reporters (2)
Covid (1)
Cross-Appeals (1)
Defamation (1)
Default Judgments (7)
Demurrers (5)
Depublished Opinions (7)
Designating the Record (1)
Dicta (1)
Discovery (9)
Disentitlement Doctrine (7)
Dismissals (15)
DismissalsAppealability and Appealable Orders (1)
Dismissed Appeals (12)
Disqualification (8)
Dissents (16)
Employment Law (4)
En Banc (1)
En Banc Review (4)
Erie Problems (1)
Ethical Duty of Candor (7)
Evidentiary Objections (14)
Evidentiary Presumptions (1)
Excessive Damages (5)
Exclusion of Evidence (14)
Exhaustion of Remedies (1)
Expert Opinions (4)
Experts (12)
Family Court (1)
Family Law (11)
Federal Appeals (20)
Federal Courts (23)
Finality and Final Orders (2)
Finding Compelled as a Matter of Law (Failure of Proof) Standard of Review (9)
first amendment (3)
Forfeiture (2)
Forfeiture and Waiver (3)
Free Exercise (1)
Free Speech (1)
Frivolous Appeals (3)
Frivolous Motions (4)
Harmless Error (3)
Implied Findings (10)
Inconsistent Verdicts (1)
Incorrect Decisions (1)
Inherent Authority (1)
Invited Error (2)
Issue Selection on Appeal (1)
Judgment Enforcement (20)
Judicial Admissions (2)
Judicial Bias (4)
Judicial Estoppel (1)
Judicial Immunity (1)
Judicial Misconduct (2)
Judicial Notice (1)
Judicial Philosophy (1)
Jurisdiction (12)
Juror Misconduct (1)
Juror Peremptory Challenges (3)
Jury Instructions (4)
Jury Waivers (3)
Landlord Tenant (3)
Law and Motion (3)
Law of the Case (1)
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (6)
Legal Practice (3)
Legal Tech (4)
Legal Writing (30)
Litigation Tips (6)
Local Rules (1)
Mediation (6)
Medical Rights (2)
Memorandum Opinions (1)
Mischief (28)
Mistrials (2)
Moot Appeals (1)
Mootness (13)
Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings (1)
Motions for Reconsideration (11)
Motions in Limine (5)
Motions to Dismiss (4)
Motions to Quash (1)
Motions to Vacate (4)
Motions to Vacate and Set Aside Judgments (7)
New Arguments (1)
New Trial (2)
New Trial Motions (12)
Ninth Circuit (8)
Ninth CircuitAbuse of Discretion (1)
Nonsuit (1)
Nonsuits JNOVs and 631.8 Judgments (1)
Notice of Appeal (1)
Notices of Appeal (22)
Notices of Entry (5)
Oral Argument (28)
Out-of-State Litigant (1)
PAGA Actions (3)
PAGA Attorney Fees (1)
Per Se Errors (2)
Personal Jurisdiction (6)
Persuasion (2)
Petitions for Rehearing (2)
Petitions for Review (6)
Pleadings (2)
Post Reversal (1)
Post Reversal Issues (2)
Post-Appellate Issues (1)
PostJudgment Litigation (1)
Posttrial Motions (12)
Precedent (1)
Preclusion (1)
Prejudicial Error (5)
Preliminary Injunctions (14)
Premature Appeals (2)
Premises Liability (1)
Pretrial Issues (3)
Pretrial Procedure (7)
print (29)
Probate Appeals (8)
Product Liability (1)
Property Rights (1)
Public Records Act and FOIA Requests (1)
Punitive Damages (1)
Race and the law (1)
Record (1)
Record Designation (3)
Record on Appeal (25)
Recovery of Costs (4)
Referral Fees (1)
Remote Arguments (2)
Respondent Arguments (9)
Restraining Orders (4)
Review as Writ Petition (1)
Right to Jury Trial (5)
Sanctions (16)
Settled Statements (2)
Settlements (10)
Split Decisions (1)
Split of Authority (1)
Splits of Authority (25)
Standards of Evidence (3)
Standards of Review (10)
Standing (5)
Stare Decisis (3)
State Civil Procedure Comparison Project (2)
Statements of Decision (29)
Stays (3)
Stays on Appeal (23)
Stipulated Judgments (7)
Stipulated Reversals (5)
Substantial Evidence (7)
Summary Judgment (3)
Summary Judgments (5)
Summary Judgments and Summary Adjudications (14)
Summary Reversal (1)
Summary Reversals (1)
Support Awards (1)
Tentative Opinions and Focus Letters (7)
Tentative Rulings (4)
the court noted (0)
Third Parties and Nonparties (1)
Timeliness (12)
Timely and Untimely Appeals (22)
Trade Restraints (1)
trademark (1)
Treble Damages (1)
Trespass (1)
Trial by Reference and Pro Tem Judges (2)
Trial Irregularities and Structural Errors (8)
Trial Procedure (11)
Trial Strategy (17)
Trial Tips (1)
Trust and Probate (6)
Typeface (1)
Typography (1)
U.S. Supreme Court (3)
Unpublished Opinions (22)
Unsupported Arguments (1)
Untimeliness (2)
Void and Voidable Judgments (2)
Waived and Forfeiture (2)
Waiver (2)
Waiver and Forfeiture (25)
Writ Petitions (15)
Writs of Mandamus (1)
Writs of Mandamus (CCP 1085) (3)

"Moot points have to be settled somehow, once they get thrust upon us. If an assertion cannot be proved, then it must be settled some other way, and nearly all of these ways are unfair to somebody."

—T.H. White, The Once and Future King

“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?”

— James Madison, Federalist 62

"At common law, barratry was 'the offense of frequently exciting and stirring up suits and quarrels' (4 Blackstone, Commentaries 134) and was punished as a misdemeanor."

Rubin v. Green (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1187

"Counsel on the firing line in an actual trial must be prepared for surprises, including requests for amendments of pleading. They cannot ask that a judgment afterwards obtained be set aside merely because their equilibrium was slightly disturbed by an unexpected motion."

Posz v. Burchell (1962) 209 Cal.App.2d 324, 334

"So far as the beginnings of law had theories, the first theory of liability was in terms of a duty to buy off the vengeance of him to whom an injury had been done whether by oneself or by something in one's power. The idea is put strikingly in the Anglo-Saxon legal proverb, 'Buy spear from side or bear it,' that is, buy off the feud or fight it out."

— Roscoe Pound, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law

"Upon putting laws into writing, they became even harder to change than before, and a hundred legal fictions rose to reconcile them with reality."

— Will Durant

"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws."

— Plato (427-347 B.C.)

"A judge is a law student who grades his own papers."

— H.L. Mencken

"God made the angels to show Him splendor, … Man He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of his mind."

— Sir Thomas More in Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons

"It may be that the court is thought to be excessively legalistic. I should be sorry to think that it is anything else."

— Hon. Sir Owen Dixon, Chief Justice of Australia

menuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram