Kowal Law Group Logo

Diverse Perspectives

| article | | Legal News | | podcast | | Videos |

Tag: Family Law

May 24, 2022
Celebrity Attorney Christopher Melcher on What Gets the Courts’ Attention

High-profile and celebrity family law attorney Chris Melcher has represented some of the largest divorce cases in California, including multiple cases ending in published appellate decisions. Chris talks with Jeff and Tim about how celebrity-driven cases shape the law, such as the #FreeBritney movement against conservatorship abuse. Chris then talks about a way to bring […]

Read More
May 19, 2022
What Family Law Attorneys Can Miss on Appeals

Victoria Fuller, a certified appellate specialist focusing on family law, explains what family law attorneys most often misunderstand about the appellate process. Her answer: “substantial evidence” review. Appellate review of a factual finding doesn’t just mean deference to the trial court. It means the appellate court considers only—only—the other side’s evidence, and completely disregards your […]

Read More
May 12, 2022
Why Family Law Writ Petitions Are So Hard

We asked Victoria Fuller, a certified appellate specialist focusing on family law, about getting the appellate court’s attention in family law writ petitions. Showing extraordinary harm in money cases is a tough sell, but it should work in family cases, right? Victoria explains that it is just just very hard, even when there is genuine irreparable […]

Read More
March 22, 2022
Victoria Fuller on Family Law Appeals: Episode 27 of the California Appellate Law Podcast

When we covered some of the tips and pitfalls of family-law appeals on episode 6 of the California Appellate Law Podcast, it became one of our most popular episodes. So we invited Victoria Fuller, a certified appellate specialist focusing on family law, to join us for another installment. Walking practitioners through various procedural issues in […]

Read More
February 22, 2022
Family Law Judgment Reversed for Failure to Provide a Statement of Decision

A statement of decision is the court’s formal explanation of the factual and legal basis for its decision. In some cases, the court is required to give a statement of decision. And in San Francisco v. Hale (D1d2 Feb. 17, 2022 no. A161503) 2022 WL 483925, the failure to provide a statement of decision was […]

Read More
December 15, 2021
Trial Court's Exclusion of Evidence Was Error Requiring Reversal of Order Denying Restraining Order

Judges have a lot of leeway to exclude evidence at trial. But in Brubaker v. Andy Strum (D2d7 Dec. 10, 2021) 2021 WL 5856791 (no. B307887) (nonpub. opn.), the exclusion was an abuse of discretion. The trial judge excluded the evidence supporting the appellant's motion for a renewed domestic violence restraining order because he thought […]

Read More
September 10, 2021
Renewed Restraining Order Affirmed on Appeal; Appellant Forfeited Challenge by Failing to Describe All Evidence Supporting the Order

In appeals from mixed discretionary and factual findings, it can be tempting to fault the trial court for failing to consider all the great evidence in the appellant's favor. But be careful not to ignore the "heavy burden" required to get review of factual questions. Failing to comprehensively evaluate the evidence against the appellant resulted in a […]

Read More
July 14, 2021
Family Judge's Refusal to Consider a Pre-Dissolution Mental Evaluation Is an Abuse of Discretion

Family court appeals are difficult because they delay an already bitter experience. The Court of Appeal is aware of this when it admonishes the family court that a recent appeal "might never have arisen had the trial court exercised its authority to make a capacity determination." Despite repeated objections by the wife that the husband's recent life-threatening […]

Read More
June 1, 2021
Denial of Domestic Violence Restraining Order Reversed; Improper to Refuse Evidence of Recent Abuse, Appeals Court Holds

Family court orders, such as domestic violence restraining orders, are often difficult to reverse because they are subject to a very deferential standard on appeal. A Court of Appeal will only reverse if it concludes the family court abused its discretion. But the abuse-of-discretion standard has limits. And when the family court misapplies the legal […]

Read More
January 6, 2021
Spousal Support Order Reversed on Appeal for Lack of Explicit Findings

In this dissolution proceeding in Nevai v. Klemunes (In re Marriage of Nevai) (D3 Dec. 29, 2020) No. C086584, wife, who had quit her engineering career to raise the couple's child, asked for monthly permanent support of $10,000 from husband, who earned between $16,000 and $18,000 per month. Wife also asked that husband be ordered to pay […]

Read More

Tags

Abuse of Discretion (24)
ADA and Unruh Accessibility Actions (2)
Administrative Law (1)
Admission of Improper Evidence (10)
Alter Ego (2)
Amicus Briefs (3)
Anecdotes (1)
Anti-SLAPP (38)
Appealability (8)
Appealability and Appealable Orders (45)
Appealable Orders (4)
Appeals Dismissed (2)
Appeals Treated as Writs (4)
Appellate Bonds (8)
Appellate Briefing (11)
Appellate Practice (8)
Appellate Sanctions (15)
Arbitration (31)
Art of Persuasion (1)
Attorney Client Privilege (2)
Attorney Fees (22)
Attorney Fees - CCP 1021.5 (1)
Attorney Feese (1)
Attorney Misconduct (1)
Bankruptcy (1)
Benefits Obtained Trespass Damages (1)
Briefing (18)
California Supreme Court (23)
CCP 998 Offers (12)
Civil Code 3334 (1)
Civil Theft (2)
Civility (18)
Class Actions (4)
Clear and Convincing (2)
Clerks Service of File Stamped Judgment (1)
Closing Argument (1)
Collateral Orders (16)
Comments (2)
Common Interest Doctrine (1)
Consenting to Judgments (1)
Constitutional Law (4)
Constitutional Litigation (1)
Contempt (3)
Court Reporters (2)
Covid (1)
Cross-Appeals (1)
Defamation (1)
Default Judgments (7)
Demurrers (5)
Depublished Opinions (7)
Designating the Record (1)
Dicta (1)
Discovery (9)
Disentitlement Doctrine (7)
Dismissals (15)
DismissalsAppealability and Appealable Orders (1)
Dismissed Appeals (12)
Disqualification (8)
Dissents (16)
Employment Law (4)
En Banc (1)
En Banc Review (4)
Erie Problems (1)
Ethical Duty of Candor (7)
Evidentiary Objections (14)
Evidentiary Presumptions (1)
Excessive Damages (5)
Exclusion of Evidence (14)
Exhaustion of Remedies (1)
Expert Opinions (4)
Experts (12)
Family Court (1)
Family Law (11)
Federal Appeals (20)
Federal Courts (23)
Finality and Final Orders (2)
Finding Compelled as a Matter of Law (Failure of Proof) Standard of Review (9)
first amendment (3)
Forfeiture (2)
Forfeiture and Waiver (3)
Free Exercise (1)
Free Speech (1)
Frivolous Appeals (3)
Frivolous Motions (4)
Harmless Error (3)
Implied Findings (10)
Inconsistent Verdicts (1)
Incorrect Decisions (1)
Inherent Authority (1)
Invited Error (2)
Issue Selection on Appeal (1)
Judgment Enforcement (20)
Judicial Admissions (2)
Judicial Bias (4)
Judicial Estoppel (1)
Judicial Immunity (1)
Judicial Misconduct (2)
Judicial Notice (1)
Judicial Philosophy (1)
Jurisdiction (12)
Juror Misconduct (1)
Juror Peremptory Challenges (3)
Jury Instructions (4)
Jury Waivers (3)
Landlord Tenant (3)
Law and Motion (3)
Law of the Case (1)
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (6)
Legal Practice (3)
Legal Tech (4)
Legal Writing (30)
Litigation Tips (6)
Local Rules (1)
Mediation (6)
Medical Rights (2)
Memorandum Opinions (1)
Mischief (28)
Mistrials (2)
Moot Appeals (1)
Mootness (13)
Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings (1)
Motions for Reconsideration (11)
Motions in Limine (5)
Motions to Dismiss (4)
Motions to Quash (1)
Motions to Vacate (4)
Motions to Vacate and Set Aside Judgments (7)
New Arguments (1)
New Trial (2)
New Trial Motions (12)
Ninth Circuit (8)
Ninth CircuitAbuse of Discretion (1)
Nonsuit (1)
Nonsuits JNOVs and 631.8 Judgments (1)
Notice of Appeal (1)
Notices of Appeal (22)
Notices of Entry (5)
Oral Argument (28)
Out-of-State Litigant (1)
PAGA Actions (3)
PAGA Attorney Fees (1)
Per Se Errors (2)
Personal Jurisdiction (6)
Persuasion (2)
Petitions for Rehearing (2)
Petitions for Review (6)
Pleadings (2)
Post Reversal (1)
Post Reversal Issues (2)
Post-Appellate Issues (1)
PostJudgment Litigation (1)
Posttrial Motions (12)
Precedent (1)
Preclusion (1)
Prejudicial Error (5)
Preliminary Injunctions (14)
Premature Appeals (2)
Premises Liability (1)
Pretrial Issues (3)
Pretrial Procedure (7)
print (29)
Probate Appeals (8)
Product Liability (1)
Property Rights (1)
Public Records Act and FOIA Requests (1)
Punitive Damages (1)
Race and the law (1)
Record (1)
Record Designation (3)
Record on Appeal (25)
Recovery of Costs (4)
Referral Fees (1)
Remote Arguments (2)
Respondent Arguments (9)
Restraining Orders (4)
Review as Writ Petition (1)
Right to Jury Trial (5)
Sanctions (16)
Settled Statements (2)
Settlements (10)
Split Decisions (1)
Split of Authority (1)
Splits of Authority (25)
Standards of Evidence (3)
Standards of Review (10)
Standing (5)
Stare Decisis (3)
State Civil Procedure Comparison Project (2)
Statements of Decision (29)
Stays (3)
Stays on Appeal (23)
Stipulated Judgments (7)
Stipulated Reversals (5)
Substantial Evidence (7)
Summary Judgment (3)
Summary Judgments (5)
Summary Judgments and Summary Adjudications (14)
Summary Reversal (1)
Summary Reversals (1)
Support Awards (1)
Tentative Opinions and Focus Letters (7)
Tentative Rulings (4)
the court noted (0)
Third Parties and Nonparties (1)
Timeliness (12)
Timely and Untimely Appeals (22)
Trade Restraints (1)
trademark (1)
Treble Damages (1)
Trespass (1)
Trial by Reference and Pro Tem Judges (2)
Trial Irregularities and Structural Errors (8)
Trial Procedure (11)
Trial Strategy (17)
Trial Tips (1)
Trust and Probate (6)
Typeface (1)
Typography (1)
U.S. Supreme Court (3)
Unpublished Opinions (22)
Unsupported Arguments (1)
Untimeliness (2)
Void and Voidable Judgments (2)
Waived and Forfeiture (2)
Waiver (2)
Waiver and Forfeiture (25)
Writ Petitions (15)
Writs of Mandamus (1)
Writs of Mandamus (CCP 1085) (3)

"Moot points have to be settled somehow, once they get thrust upon us. If an assertion cannot be proved, then it must be settled some other way, and nearly all of these ways are unfair to somebody."

—T.H. White, The Once and Future King

"So far as the beginnings of law had theories, the first theory of liability was in terms of a duty to buy off the vengeance of him to whom an injury had been done whether by oneself or by something in one's power. The idea is put strikingly in the Anglo-Saxon legal proverb, 'Buy spear from side or bear it,' that is, buy off the feud or fight it out."

— Roscoe Pound, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law

"Counsel on the firing line in an actual trial must be prepared for surprises, including requests for amendments of pleading. They cannot ask that a judgment afterwards obtained be set aside merely because their equilibrium was slightly disturbed by an unexpected motion."

Posz v. Burchell (1962) 209 Cal.App.2d 324, 334

"At common law, barratry was 'the offense of frequently exciting and stirring up suits and quarrels' (4 Blackstone, Commentaries 134) and was punished as a misdemeanor."

Rubin v. Green (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1187

Show neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your fellow men justly.

Leviticus

"A judge is a law student who grades his own papers."

— H.L. Mencken

“It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?”

— James Madison, Federalist 62

"God made the angels to show Him splendor, … Man He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of his mind."

— Sir Thomas More in Robert Bolt's A Man for All Seasons

"Upon putting laws into writing, they became even harder to change than before, and a hundred legal fictions rose to reconcile them with reality."

— Will Durant

"It may be that the court is thought to be excessively legalistic. I should be sorry to think that it is anything else."

— Hon. Sir Owen Dixon, Chief Justice of Australia

menuchevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram